On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 4:56 AM Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com wrote:
Sphinx reported inline emphasis warning on netfs:
Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library.rst:384: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string. Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library.rst:384: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string. Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library:609: ./fs/netfs/buffered_read.c:318: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
These warnings above are due to unsecaped *foliop, which confuses Sphinx as italics syntax instead.
Use inline code for the pointer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202207140742.GTPk4U8i-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: 157be6ddd9e438 ("netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice") Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Cc: Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net Cc: David Howells dhowells@redhat.com Cc: Jeff Layton jlayton@kernel.org Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" willy@infradead.org Cc: Xiubo Li xiubli@redhat.com Cc: Ilya Dryomov idryomov@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya bagasdotme@gmail.com
Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library.rst | 6 +++--- fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library.rst index 8d4cf5d5822de4..73a4176144b3b8 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/netfs_library.rst @@ -382,9 +382,9 @@ The operations are as follows: conflicting state before allowing it to be modified.
It may unlock and discard the folio it was given and set the caller's folio
- pointer to NULL. It should return 0 if everything is now fine (*foliop
- left set) or the op should be retried (*foliop cleared) and any other error
- code to abort the operation.
pointer to NULL. It should return 0 if everything is now fine (``*foliop``
left set) or the op should be retried (``*foliop`` cleared) and any other
error code to abort the operation.
- ``done``
diff --git a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c index 8fa0725cd64981..0ce53585215106 100644 --- a/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c +++ b/fs/netfs/buffered_read.c @@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ static bool netfs_skip_folio_read(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, size_t len,
- pointer to the fsdata cookie that gets returned to the VM to be passed to
- write_end. It is permitted to sleep. It should return 0 if the request
- should go ahead or it may return an error. It may also unlock and put the
- folio, provided it sets *foliop to NULL, in which case a return of 0 will
- cause the folio to be re-got and the process to be retried.
- folio, provided it sets ``*foliop`` to NULL, in which case a return of 0
- will cause the folio to be re-got and the process to be retried.
- The calling netfs must initialise a netfs context contiguous to the vfs
- inode before calling this.
-- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Hi Bagas,
I folded this fixup into the original patch and added your Signed-off-by. I hope you don't mind.
Thanks,
Ilya