On 28/08/24 15:18, Ma Ke wrote:
In parport_attach, the return value of ida_alloc is unchecked, witch leads to the use of an invalid index value.
To address this issue, index should be checked. When the index value is abnormal, the device should be freed.
Found by code review, compile tested only.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: fb56d97df70e ("pps: client: use new parport device model") Signed-off-by: Ma Ke make24@iscas.ac.cn
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti giometti@enneenne.com
Changes in v3:
- modified Fixes tag as suggestions.
Changes in v2:
- removed error output as suggestions.
drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c b/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c index 63d03a0df5cc..abaffb4e1c1c 100644 --- a/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c +++ b/drivers/pps/clients/pps_parport.c @@ -149,6 +149,9 @@ static void parport_attach(struct parport *port) } index = ida_alloc(&pps_client_index, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (index < 0)
goto err_free_device;- memset(&pps_client_cb, 0, sizeof(pps_client_cb)); pps_client_cb.private = device; pps_client_cb.irq_func = parport_irq;
@@ -159,7 +162,7 @@ static void parport_attach(struct parport *port) index); if (!device->pardev) { pr_err("couldn't register with %s\n", port->name);
goto err_free;
goto err_free_ida;if (parport_claim_or_block(device->pardev) < 0) { @@ -187,8 +190,9 @@ static void parport_attach(struct parport *port) parport_release(device->pardev); err_unregister_dev: parport_unregister_device(device->pardev); -err_free: +err_free_ida: ida_free(&pps_client_index, index); +err_free_device: kfree(device); }