4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Prashant Bhole bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp
[ Upstream commit ddd0010392d9cbcb95b53d11b7cafc67b373ab56 ]
eBPF test fails due to verifier failure because log_buf is too small. Fixed by increasing log_buf size
Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn willemb@google.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_fanout.c @@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ static void sock_fanout_getopts(int fd,
static void sock_fanout_set_ebpf(int fd) { + static char log_buf[65536]; + const int len_off = __builtin_offsetof(struct __sk_buff, len); struct bpf_insn prog[] = { { BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOV | BPF_X, 6, 1, 0, 0 }, @@ -140,7 +142,6 @@ static void sock_fanout_set_ebpf(int fd) { BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K, 0, 0, 0, 0 }, { BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT, 0, 0, 0, 0 } }; - char log_buf[512]; union bpf_attr attr; int pfd;