5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 9b401f4a7170125365160c9af267a41ff6b39001 ]
This driver calls pinctrl_register_and_init() which is not devm_ managed, it will leads memory leak if pinctrl_enable() fails. Replace it with devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(). And add missing of_node_put() in the error path.
Fixes: 5038a66dad01 ("pinctrl: core: delete incorrect free in pinctrl_enable()") Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang yangyingliang@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@linaro.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606023704.3931561-4-yangyingliang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c index 60d94c1fc6a6d..6e1b067fb72ed 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int ti_iodelay_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) iod->desc.name = dev_name(dev); iod->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
- ret = pinctrl_register_and_init(&iod->desc, dev, iod, &iod->pctl); + ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(dev, &iod->desc, iod, &iod->pctl); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "Failed to register pinctrl\n"); goto exit_out; @@ -889,7 +889,11 @@ static int ti_iodelay_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iod);
- return pinctrl_enable(iod->pctl); + ret = pinctrl_enable(iod->pctl); + if (ret) + goto exit_out; + + return 0;
exit_out: of_node_put(np); @@ -906,9 +910,6 @@ static int ti_iodelay_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct ti_iodelay_device *iod = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- if (iod->pctl) - pinctrl_unregister(iod->pctl); - ti_iodelay_pinconf_deinit_dev(iod);
/* Expect other allocations to be freed by devm */