[PATCH 3/3] vfs: return -EOVERFLOW in generic_remap_checks() when overflow check fails

Keep it consistent with the handling of the same check within generic_copy_file_checks(). Also, returning -EOVERFLOW in this case is more appropriate.

Signed-off-by: Julian Sun sunjunchao2870@gmail.com --- fs/remap_range.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/remap_range.c b/fs/remap_range.c index 6fdeb3c8cb70..a26521ded5c8 100644 --- a/fs/remap_range.c +++ b/fs/remap_range.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int generic_remap_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,

/* The start of both ranges must be aligned to an fs block. */ if (!IS_ALIGNED(pos_in, bs) || !IS_ALIGNED(pos_out, bs)) - return -EINVAL; + return -EOVERFLOW;

/* Ensure offsets don't wrap. */ if (check_add_overflow(pos_in, count, &tmp) ||