6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Namjae Jeon linkinjeon@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 1df0d4c616138784e033ad337961b6e1a6bcd999 ]
wait_event_timeout() will set the state of the current task to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, before doing the condition check. This means that ksmbd_durable_scavenger_alive() will try to acquire the mutex while already in a sleeping state. The scheduler warns us by giving the following warning:
do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at [<0000000061515a6f>] prepare_to_wait_event+0x9f/0x6c0 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 4147 at kernel/sched/core.c:10099 __might_sleep+0x12f/0x160
mutex lock is not needed in ksmbd_durable_scavenger_alive().
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon linkinjeon@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steve French stfrench@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c b/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c index 8d1f30dcba7e8..1f8fa3468173a 100644 --- a/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c +++ b/fs/smb/server/vfs_cache.c @@ -713,12 +713,8 @@ static bool tree_conn_fd_check(struct ksmbd_tree_connect *tcon,
static bool ksmbd_durable_scavenger_alive(void) { - mutex_lock(&durable_scavenger_lock); - if (!durable_scavenger_running) { - mutex_unlock(&durable_scavenger_lock); + if (!durable_scavenger_running) return false; - } - mutex_unlock(&durable_scavenger_lock);
if (kthread_should_stop()) return false; @@ -799,9 +795,7 @@ static int ksmbd_durable_scavenger(void *dummy) break; }
- mutex_lock(&durable_scavenger_lock); durable_scavenger_running = false; - mutex_unlock(&durable_scavenger_lock);
module_put(THIS_MODULE);