Hi Paul,
One question below.
Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Sat, 29 Jun 2019 03:22:48 +0200:
If MTD_NAND_JZ4780 is y and MTD_NAND_JZ4780_BCH is m, which select CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC to m, building fails:
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.o: In function `ingenic_nand_remove': ingenic_nand.c:(.text+0x177): undefined reference to `ingenic_ecc_release' drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand.o: In function `ingenic_nand_ecc_correct': ingenic_nand.c:(.text+0x2ee): undefined reference to `ingenic_ecc_correct'
To fix that, the ingenic_nand and ingenic_ecc modules have been fused into one single module.
- The ingenic_ecc.c code is now compiled in only if $(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC) is set. This is now a boolean instead of tristate.
- To avoid changing the module name, the ingenic_nand.c file is moved to ingenic_nand_drv.c. Then the module name is still ingenic_nand.
- Since ingenic_ecc.c is no more a module, the module-specific macros have been dropped, and the functions are no more exported for use by the ingenic_nand driver.
I am fine with this approach.
Fixes: 15de8c6efd0e ("mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Separate top-level and SoC specific code") Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de Reported-by: Hulk Robot hulkci@huawei.com Cc: YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile | 4 +++- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c | 9 --------- .../raw/ingenic/{ingenic_nand.c => ingenic_nand_drv.c} | 0 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) rename drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/{ingenic_nand.c => ingenic_nand_drv.c} (100%)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig index 19a96ce515c1..66b7cffdb0c2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Kconfig @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ config MTD_NAND_JZ4780 if MTD_NAND_JZ4780 config MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC
- tristate
- bool
config MTD_NAND_JZ4740_ECC tristate "Hardware BCH support for JZ4740 SoC" diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile index 1ac4f455baea..b63d36889263 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4740) += jz4740_nand.o obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780) += ingenic_nand.o -obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC) += ingenic_ecc.o +ingenic_nand-y += ingenic_nand_drv.o +ingenic_nand-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_INGENIC_ECC) += ingenic_ecc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4740_ECC) += jz4740_ecc.o obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4725B_BCH) += jz4725b_bch.o obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780_BCH) += jz4780_bch.o diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c index d3e085c5685a..c954189606f6 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_ecc.c @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ int ingenic_ecc_calculate(struct ingenic_ecc *ecc, { return ecc->ops->calculate(ecc, params, buf, ecc_code); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_calculate); /**
- ingenic_ecc_correct() - detect and correct bit errors
@@ -51,7 +50,6 @@ int ingenic_ecc_correct(struct ingenic_ecc *ecc, { return ecc->ops->correct(ecc, params, buf, ecc_code); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_correct); /**
- ingenic_ecc_get() - get the ECC controller device
@@ -111,7 +109,6 @@ struct ingenic_ecc *of_ingenic_ecc_get(struct device_node *of_node) } return ecc; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_ingenic_ecc_get); /**
- ingenic_ecc_release() - release the ECC controller device
@@ -122,7 +119,6 @@ void ingenic_ecc_release(struct ingenic_ecc *ecc) clk_disable_unprepare(ecc->clk); put_device(ecc->dev); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_release); int ingenic_ecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { @@ -159,8 +155,3 @@ int ingenic_ecc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(ingenic_ecc_probe);
Any reason to keep this one?
Thanks, Miquèl