6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com
[ Upstream commit b8e947e9f64cac9df85a07672b658df5b2bcff07 ]
Some arch + compiler combinations report a potentially unused variable location in btrfs_lookup_dentry(). This is a false alert as the variable is passed by value and always valid or there's an error. The compilers cannot probably reason about that although btrfs_inode_by_name() is in the same file.
- /kisskb/src/fs/btrfs/inode.c: error: 'location.objectid' may be used
+uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]: => 5603:9
- /kisskb/src/fs/btrfs/inode.c: error: 'location.type' may be used
+uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]: => 5674:5
m68k-gcc8/m68k-allmodconfig mips-gcc8/mips-allmodconfig powerpc-gcc5/powerpc-all{mod,yes}config powerpc-gcc5/ppc64_defconfig
Initialize it to zero, this should fix the warnings and won't change the behaviour as btrfs_inode_by_name() accepts only a root or inode item types, otherwise returns an error.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert@linux-m68k.org Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert@linux-m68k.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/bd4e9928-17b3-9257-8ba7-6b7f9bbb639a@lin... Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo wqu@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index c2f48fc159e5..2951aa0039fc 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -5699,7 +5699,7 @@ struct inode *btrfs_lookup_dentry(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) struct inode *inode; struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(dir)->root; struct btrfs_root *sub_root = root; - struct btrfs_key location; + struct btrfs_key location = { 0 }; u8 di_type = 0; int ret = 0;