Hi Greg,
Thank you so much for the information! I will send the missing "fixes" patch first to v5.10 & then send a v2 for v5.4 including the missing "fixes" patch.
Thanks, Shubham
On 30/07/25 2:41 pm, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:56:18AM +0530, skulkarni@mvista.com wrote:
My apologies for sending the HTML content in the previous email/reply which was rejected by the stable mailing list. Here is a resend without HTML part:
Hello Sasha/Greg,
For the "found follow-up fixes in mainline warning" for this patch: "Found fixes commits: 5e8670610b93 selftests: forwarding: tc_actions: Use ncat instead of nc"
While analysing the patches, I actually had noticed that the commit 5e867061 is a follow up i.e. "fixes" commit. But this commit 5e867061 is not part of the next stable kernel v5.10.y and as per my understanding, we are not allowed to backport a commit which is not in the next stable kernel version. Thus I haven't included that commit/patch here.
I am new to the process & learning the rules. Can you please let me know if any action is required from my side for this patchset here?
You need to submit all of the needed fixes for anything you have backported as well. As you are introducing a "problem", that would not be good.
But, as you say, this is not in the 5.10.y tree yet, so please submit a version for that as well, then there should not be any problem.
thanks,
greg k-h