From: Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn
commit 1ade48d0c27d5da1ccf4b583d8c5fc8b534a3ac8 upstream.
The existing cleanup routine implementation is not well synchronized with the syscall routine. When a device is detaching, below race could occur.
static int ax25_sendmsg(...) { ... lock_sock() ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk); if (ax25->ax25_dev == NULL) // CHECK ... ax25_queue_xmit(skb, ax25->ax25_dev->dev); // USE ... }
static void ax25_kill_by_device(...) { ... if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { s->ax25_dev = NULL; ... }
Other syscall functions like ax25_getsockopt, ax25_getname, ax25_info_show also suffer from similar races. To fix them, this patch introduce lock_sock() into ax25_kill_by_device in order to guarantee that the nullify action in cleanup routine cannot proceed when another socket request is pending.
Signed-off-by: Hanjie Wu nagi@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Lin Ma linma@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c @@ -88,8 +88,10 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct n again: ax25_for_each(s, &ax25_list) { if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { - s->ax25_dev = NULL; spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); + lock_sock(s->sk); + s->ax25_dev = NULL; + release_sock(s->sk); ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);