[ Upstream commit 096377525cdb8251e4656085efc988bdf733fb4c ]
According to the logitech_hidpp_2.0_specification_draft_2012-06-04.pdf doc: https://lekensteyn.nl/files/logitech/logitech_hidpp_2.0_specification_draft_...
We should use a register-access-protocol request using the short input / output report ids. This is necessary because 27MHz HID++ receivers have a max-packetsize on their HIP++ endpoint of 8, so they cannot support long reports. Using a feature-access-protocol request (which is always long or very-long) with these will cause a timeout error, followed by the hidpp driver treating the device as not being HID++ capable.
This commit fixes this by switching to using a rap request to get the protocol version.
Besides being tested with a (046d:c517) 27MHz receiver with various 27MHz keyboards and mice, this has also been tested to not cause regressions on a non-unifying dual-HID++ nano receiver (046d:c534) with k270 and m185 HID++-2.0 devices connected and on a unifying/dj receiver (046d:c52b) with a HID++-2.0 Logitech Rechargeable Touchpad T650.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c index 199cc256e9d9d..ffd30c7492df8 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c @@ -836,13 +836,16 @@ static int hidpp_root_get_feature(struct hidpp_device *hidpp, u16 feature,
static int hidpp_root_get_protocol_version(struct hidpp_device *hidpp) { + const u8 ping_byte = 0x5a; + u8 ping_data[3] = { 0, 0, ping_byte }; struct hidpp_report response; int ret;
- ret = hidpp_send_fap_command_sync(hidpp, + ret = hidpp_send_rap_command_sync(hidpp, + REPORT_ID_HIDPP_SHORT, HIDPP_PAGE_ROOT_IDX, CMD_ROOT_GET_PROTOCOL_VERSION, - NULL, 0, &response); + ping_data, sizeof(ping_data), &response);
if (ret == HIDPP_ERROR_INVALID_SUBID) { hidpp->protocol_major = 1; @@ -862,8 +865,14 @@ static int hidpp_root_get_protocol_version(struct hidpp_device *hidpp) if (ret) return ret;
- hidpp->protocol_major = response.fap.params[0]; - hidpp->protocol_minor = response.fap.params[1]; + if (response.rap.params[2] != ping_byte) { + hid_err(hidpp->hid_dev, "%s: ping mismatch 0x%02x != 0x%02x\n", + __func__, response.rap.params[2], ping_byte); + return -EPROTO; + } + + hidpp->protocol_major = response.rap.params[0]; + hidpp->protocol_minor = response.rap.params[1];
return ret; }