From: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com
commit a08f789d2ab5242c07e716baf9a835725046be89 upstream.
Hulk Robot reported a BUG_ON: ================================================================== kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:3211! [...] RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used.cold+0x85/0x136f [...] Call Trace: ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x9df/0x5d30 ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1803/0x4d80 ext4_map_blocks+0x3a4/0x1a10 ext4_writepages+0x126d/0x2c30 do_writepages+0x7f/0x1b0 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x285/0x3b0 file_write_and_wait_range+0xb1/0x140 ext4_sync_file+0x1aa/0xca0 vfs_fsync_range+0xfb/0x260 do_fsync+0x48/0xa0 [...] ==================================================================
Above issue may happen as follows: ------------------------------------- do_fsync vfs_fsync_range ext4_sync_file file_write_and_wait_range __filemap_fdatawrite_range do_writepages ext4_writepages mpage_map_and_submit_extent mpage_map_one_extent ext4_map_blocks ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_mb_normalize_request >>> start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical ext4_mb_regular_allocator ext4_mb_simple_scan_group ext4_mb_use_best_found ext4_mb_new_preallocation ext4_mb_new_inode_pa ext4_mb_use_inode_pa >>> set ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0 ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used >>> BUG_ON(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len <= 0);
we can easily reproduce this problem with the following commands: `fallocate -l100M disk` `mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 -g 256 disk` `mount disk /mnt` `fsstress -d /mnt -l 0 -n 1000 -p 1`
The size must be smaller than or equal to EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP. Therefore, "start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical" may occur when the size is truncated. So start should be the start position of the group where ac_o_ex.fe_logical is located after alignment. In addition, when the value of fe_logical or EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP is very large, the value calculated by start_off is more accurate.
Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: cd648b8a8fd5 ("ext4: trim allocation requests to group size") Reported-by: Hulk Robot hulkci@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Baokun Li libaokun1@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani ritesh.list@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220528110017.354175-2-libaokun1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o tytso@mit.edu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -4107,6 +4107,15 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_al size = size >> bsbits; start = start_off >> bsbits;
+ /* + * For tiny groups (smaller than 8MB) the chosen allocation + * alignment may be larger than group size. Make sure the + * alignment does not move allocation to a different group which + * makes mballoc fail assertions later. + */ + start = max(start, rounddown(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical, + (ext4_lblk_t)EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb))); + /* don't cover already allocated blocks in selected range */ if (ar->pleft && start <= ar->lleft) { size -= ar->lleft + 1 - start;