4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "J. Bruce Fields" bfields@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit efda760fe95ea15291853c8fa9235c32d319cd98 ]
As reported by David Jeffery: "a signal was sent to lockd while lockd was shutting down from a request to stop nfs. The signal causes lockd to call restart_grace() which puts the lockd_net structure on the grace list. If this signal is received at the wrong time, it will occur after lockd_down_net() has called locks_end_grace() but before lockd_down_net() stops the lockd thread. This leads to lockd putting the lockd_net structure back on the grace list, then exiting without anything removing it from the list."
So, perform the final locks_end_grace() from the the lockd thread; this ensures it's serialized with respect to restart_grace().
Reported-by: David Jeffery djeffery@redhat.com Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields bfields@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/lockd/svc.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/lockd/svc.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svc.c @@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ lockd(void *vrqstp) { int err = 0; struct svc_rqst *rqstp = vrqstp; + struct net *net = &init_net; + struct lockd_net *ln = net_generic(net, lockd_net_id);
/* try_to_freeze() is called from svc_recv() */ set_freezable(); @@ -176,6 +178,8 @@ lockd(void *vrqstp) if (nlmsvc_ops) nlmsvc_invalidate_all(); nlm_shutdown_hosts(); + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ln->grace_period_end); + locks_end_grace(&ln->lockd_manager); return 0; }
@@ -270,8 +274,6 @@ static void lockd_down_net(struct svc_se if (ln->nlmsvc_users) { if (--ln->nlmsvc_users == 0) { nlm_shutdown_hosts_net(net); - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ln->grace_period_end); - locks_end_grace(&ln->lockd_manager); svc_shutdown_net(serv, net); dprintk("lockd_down_net: per-net data destroyed; net=%p\n", net); }