6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
[ Upstream commit 4e59267c7a20eb1c1ad9106e682cb6a0d8eb3111 ]
Currently a pwm_chip stores in its struct device *dev member a pointer to the parent device. Preparing a change that embeds a full struct device in struct pwm_chip, this accessor function should be used in all drivers directly accessing chip->dev now. This way struct pwm_chip and this new function can be changed without having to touch all drivers in the same change set.
Make use of this function in the framework's core sources.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cc30090d2f9762bed9854a55612144bccc910781.170790077... Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Stable-dep-of: 3e551115aee0 ("pwm: meson: Add check for error from clk_round_rate()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/pwm/core.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- drivers/pwm/sysfs.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/pwm.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c index 1b4c3d0caa824..830a697826af5 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c @@ -71,18 +71,18 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (s2.polarity != state->polarity && state->duty_cycle < state->period) - dev_warn(chip->dev, ".apply ignored .polarity\n"); + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply ignored .polarity\n");
if (state->enabled && last->polarity == state->polarity && last->period > s2.period && last->period <= state->period) - dev_warn(chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply didn't pick the best available period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu, possible: %llu)\n", state->period, s2.period, last->period);
if (state->enabled && state->period < s2.period) - dev_warn(chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply is supposed to round down period (requested: %llu, applied: %llu)\n", state->period, s2.period);
@@ -91,20 +91,20 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, last->period == s2.period && last->duty_cycle > s2.duty_cycle && last->duty_cycle <= state->duty_cycle) - dev_warn(chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply didn't pick the best available duty cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu, possible: %llu/%llu)\n", state->duty_cycle, state->period, s2.duty_cycle, s2.period, last->duty_cycle, last->period);
if (state->enabled && state->duty_cycle < s2.duty_cycle) - dev_warn(chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply is supposed to round down duty_cycle (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu)\n", state->duty_cycle, state->period, s2.duty_cycle, s2.period);
if (!state->enabled && s2.enabled && s2.duty_cycle > 0) - dev_warn(chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), "requested disabled, but yielded enabled with duty > 0\n");
/* reapply the state that the driver reported being configured. */ @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, trace_pwm_apply(pwm, &s1, err); if (err) { *last = s1; - dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to reapply current setting\n"); + dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), "failed to reapply current setting\n"); return; }
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm, s1.polarity != last->polarity || (s1.enabled && s1.period != last->period) || (s1.enabled && s1.duty_cycle != last->duty_cycle)) { - dev_err(chip->dev, + dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip), ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu)\n", s1.enabled, s1.polarity, s1.duty_cycle, s1.period, last->enabled, last->polarity, last->duty_cycle, @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static struct pwm_chip *pwmchip_find_by_name(const char *name) mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
idr_for_each_entry_ul(&pwm_chips, chip, tmp, id) { - const char *chip_name = dev_name(chip->dev); + const char *chip_name = dev_name(pwmchip_parent(chip));
if (chip_name && strcmp(chip_name, name) == 0) { mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock); @@ -456,19 +456,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pwm_single_xlate);
static void of_pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip) { - if (!chip->dev || !chip->dev->of_node) + if (!pwmchip_parent(chip) || !pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node) return;
if (!chip->of_xlate) chip->of_xlate = of_pwm_xlate_with_flags;
- of_node_get(chip->dev->of_node); + of_node_get(pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node); }
static void of_pwmchip_remove(struct pwm_chip *chip) { - if (chip->dev) - of_node_put(chip->dev->of_node); + if (pwmchip_parent(chip)) + of_node_put(pwmchip_parent(chip)->of_node); }
static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_chip *chip) @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static bool pwm_ops_check(const struct pwm_chip *chip) return false;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM_DEBUG) && !ops->get_state) - dev_warn(chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), "Please implement the .get_state() callback\n");
return true; @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int __pwmchip_add(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct module *owner) unsigned int i; int ret;
- if (!chip || !chip->dev || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm) + if (!chip || !pwmchip_parent(chip) || !chip->ops || !chip->npwm) return -EINVAL;
if (!pwm_ops_check(chip)) @@ -594,15 +594,15 @@ static struct device_link *pwm_device_link_add(struct device *dev, * impact the PM sequence ordering: the PWM supplier may get * suspended before the consumer. */ - dev_warn(pwm->chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip), "No consumer device specified to create a link to\n"); return NULL; }
- dl = device_link_add(dev, pwm->chip->dev, DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER); + dl = device_link_add(dev, pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip), DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER); if (!dl) { dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n", - dev_name(pwm->chip->dev)); + dev_name(pwmchip_parent(pwm->chip))); return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); }
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static struct pwm_chip *fwnode_to_pwmchip(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode) mutex_lock(&pwm_lock);
idr_for_each_entry_ul(&pwm_chips, chip, tmp, id) - if (chip->dev && device_match_fwnode(chip->dev, fwnode)) { + if (pwmchip_parent(chip) && device_match_fwnode(pwmchip_parent(chip), fwnode)) { mutex_unlock(&pwm_lock); return chip; } @@ -1085,8 +1085,8 @@ static int pwm_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
seq_printf(s, "%s%d: %s/%s, %d PWM device%s\n", (char *)s->private, chip->id, - chip->dev->bus ? chip->dev->bus->name : "no-bus", - dev_name(chip->dev), chip->npwm, + pwmchip_parent(chip)->bus ? pwmchip_parent(chip)->bus->name : "no-bus", + dev_name(pwmchip_parent(chip)), chip->npwm, (chip->npwm != 1) ? "s" : "");
pwm_dbg_show(chip, s); diff --git a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c index 1698609d91c8a..3f434a771fb52 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c @@ -509,10 +509,10 @@ void pwmchip_sysfs_export(struct pwm_chip *chip) * If device_create() fails the pwm_chip is still usable by * the kernel it's just not exported. */ - parent = device_create(&pwm_class, chip->dev, MKDEV(0, 0), chip, + parent = device_create(&pwm_class, pwmchip_parent(chip), MKDEV(0, 0), chip, "pwmchip%d", chip->id); if (IS_ERR(parent)) { - dev_warn(chip->dev, + dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip), "device_create failed for pwm_chip sysfs export\n"); } } diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h index 8ffe9ae7a23a9..07af6910bdced 100644 --- a/include/linux/pwm.h +++ b/include/linux/pwm.h @@ -289,6 +289,11 @@ struct pwm_chip { struct pwm_device *pwms; };
+static inline struct device *pwmchip_parent(const struct pwm_chip *chip) +{ + return chip->dev; +} + #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PWM) /* PWM user APIs */ int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state);