4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Benjamin Poirier bpoirier@suse.com
commit c4c40e51f9c32c6dd8adf606624c930a1c4d9bbb upstream.
In case of error from e1e_rphy(), the loop will exit early and "success" will be set to true erroneously.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier bpoirier@suse.com Tested-by: Aaron Brown aaron.f.brown@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir amit.pundir@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/phy.c @@ -1744,6 +1744,7 @@ s32 e1000e_phy_has_link_generic(struct e s32 ret_val = 0; u16 i, phy_status;
+ *success = false; for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { /* Some PHYs require the MII_BMSR register to be read * twice due to the link bit being sticky. No harm doing @@ -1763,16 +1764,16 @@ s32 e1000e_phy_has_link_generic(struct e ret_val = e1e_rphy(hw, MII_BMSR, &phy_status); if (ret_val) break; - if (phy_status & BMSR_LSTATUS) + if (phy_status & BMSR_LSTATUS) { + *success = true; break; + } if (usec_interval >= 1000) msleep(usec_interval / 1000); else udelay(usec_interval); }
- *success = (i < iterations); - return ret_val; }