5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com
commit d167aa76dc0683828588c25767da07fb549e4f48 upstream.
The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the fsid in the provided superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to do that.
Such as in the following stack:
write_all_supers() sb = fs_info->super_for_commit; btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb) btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
scrub_one_super() btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
And check_dev_super() btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)
However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::fsid instead, which is not correct. Fix this using the correct fsid in the superblock argument.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli gpiccoli@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.jain@oracle.com Reviewed-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -2496,11 +2496,10 @@ static int validate_super(struct btrfs_f ret = -EINVAL; }
- if (memcmp(fs_info->fs_devices->fsid, fs_info->super_copy->fsid, - BTRFS_FSID_SIZE)) { + if (memcmp(fs_info->fs_devices->fsid, sb->fsid, BTRFS_FSID_SIZE) != 0) { btrfs_err(fs_info, "superblock fsid doesn't match fsid of fs_devices: %pU != %pU", - fs_info->super_copy->fsid, fs_info->fs_devices->fsid); + sb->fsid, fs_info->fs_devices->fsid); ret = -EINVAL; }