From: Yuntao Wang ytcoode@gmail.com
commit b45043192b3e481304062938a6561da2ceea46a6 upstream.
The 'n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))' part of the allocated memory for 'smap' is never used after the memlock accounting was removed, thus get rid of it.
[ Note, Daniel:
Commit b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps") moved `cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket))` up and therefore before the bpf_map_area_alloc() allocation, sigh. In a later step commit c85d69135a91 ("bpf: move memory size checks to bpf_map_charge_init()"), and the overflow checks of `cost >= U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE` moved into bpf_map_charge_init(). And then 370868107bf6 ("bpf: Eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps") finally removed the bpf_map_charge_init(). Anyway, the original code did the allocation same way as /after/ this fix. ]
Fixes: b936ca643ade ("bpf: rework memlock-based memory accounting for maps") Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang ytcoode@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220407130423.798386-1-ytcoode@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c @@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *stack_map_alloc(u return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
cost = n_buckets * sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket *) + sizeof(*smap); - cost += n_buckets * (value_size + sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket)); smap = bpf_map_area_alloc(cost, bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr)); if (!smap) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);