6.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com
[ Upstream commit 96dddb7b9406259baace9a1831e8da155311be6f ]
When checking MTE tags, we print some diagnostic messages when the tests fail. Some variables uses there are "longs", however we only use "%x" for the format specifier.
Update the format specifiers to "%lx", to match the variable types they are supposed to print.
Fixes: f3b2a26ca78d ("kselftest/arm64: Verify mte tag inclusion via prctl") Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com Reviewed-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240816153251.2833702-9-andre.przywara@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c index 2b1425b92b699..a3d1e23fe02af 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int check_single_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode) ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE); /* Check tag value */ if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) == tag) { - ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n", + ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%lx with include mask=0x%x\n", MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr), MT_INCLUDE_VALID_TAG(tag)); result = KSFT_FAIL; @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int check_multiple_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode) ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE); /* Check tag value */ if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) < tag) { - ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n", + ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%lx with include mask=0x%lx\n", MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr), MT_INCLUDE_VALID_TAGS(excl_mask)); result = KSFT_FAIL;