6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Edward Liaw edliaw@google.com
[ Upstream commit 7d50e00fef2832e98d7e06bbfc85c1d66ee110ca ]
Testcase should fail if -EWOULDBLOCK is not returned when expected value differs from actual value from the waiter.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250404221225.1596324-1-edliaw@google.com Fixes: 9d57f7c79748920636f8293d2f01192d702fe390 ("selftests: futex: Test sys_futex_waitv() wouldblock") Signed-off-by: Edward Liaw edliaw@google.com Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reviewed-by: André Almeida andrealmeid@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c index 7d7a6a06cdb75..2d8230da90642 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait_wouldblock.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) info("Calling futex_waitv on f1: %u @ %p with val=%u\n", f1, &f1, f1+1); res = futex_waitv(&waitv, 1, 0, &to, CLOCK_MONOTONIC); if (!res || errno != EWOULDBLOCK) { - ksft_test_result_pass("futex_waitv returned: %d %s\n", + ksft_test_result_fail("futex_waitv returned: %d %s\n", res ? errno : res, res ? strerror(errno) : ""); ret = RET_FAIL;