On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:38:49AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 12:23 +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content. On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:16:05AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your information.
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 11:47 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
External email : Please do not click links or open attachments
until
you have verified the sender or the content. On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:13PM +0800, Jason-JH.Lin via B4
Relay
wrote:
From: "Jason-JH.Lin" jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com
This reverts commit ac88a1f41f93499df6f50fd18ea835e6ff4f3200.
Reason for revert:
- The commit [1] does not land on linux-5.15, so this patch
does
not
fix anything.
- Since the fw_device improvements series [2] does not land on
linux-5.15, using device_set_fwnode() causes the panel to flash
during
bootup.
Incorrect link management may lead to incorrect device
initialization,
affecting firmware node links and consumer relationships. The fwnode setting of panel to the DSI device would cause a DSI initialization error without series[2], so this patch was
reverted
to
avoid using the incomplete fw_devlink functionality.
[1] commit 3fb16866b51d ("driver core: fw_devlink: Make cycle
detection more robust")
[2] Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230207014207.1678715-1-saravanak@google.com
Please don't mind me make a confirmation. I just need to add this line here and send it again, right?
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #5.15.169
Yes.
Hi Greg,
Thanks for your confirmation!
I've sent the patch again without adding `v2` after the [PATCH]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024-fixup-5-15-v1-1-62f21a32b5a5@mediatek.c... Would that be fine with you?
But it is a v2 patch, why not mark it as such?