On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:43:52PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
From: Julia Lawall Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr
The mmc_pwrseq_ops structures are never modified, so declare them as const.
Done with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org (cherry picked from commit ffedbd2210f2f4cba490a9205adc11fd1b89a852) Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.h | 2 +- drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_emmc.c | 2 +- drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_simple.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.h b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.h index 096da48c6a7e..133de0426687 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.h +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq.h @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct mmc_pwrseq_ops { }; struct mmc_pwrseq {
- struct mmc_pwrseq_ops *ops;
- const struct mmc_pwrseq_ops *ops;
}; #ifdef CONFIG_OF diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_emmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_emmc.c index ad4f94ec7e8d..4a82bc77fe49 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_emmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_emmc.c @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static void mmc_pwrseq_emmc_free(struct mmc_host *host) kfree(pwrseq); } -static struct mmc_pwrseq_ops mmc_pwrseq_emmc_ops = { +static const struct mmc_pwrseq_ops mmc_pwrseq_emmc_ops = { .post_power_on = mmc_pwrseq_emmc_reset, .free = mmc_pwrseq_emmc_free, }; diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_simple.c b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_simple.c index d10538bb5e07..2b16263458af 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_simple.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/pwrseq_simple.c @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void mmc_pwrseq_simple_free(struct mmc_host *host) kfree(pwrseq); } -static struct mmc_pwrseq_ops mmc_pwrseq_simple_ops = { +static const struct mmc_pwrseq_ops mmc_pwrseq_simple_ops = { .pre_power_on = mmc_pwrseq_simple_pre_power_on, .post_power_on = mmc_pwrseq_simple_post_power_on, .power_off = mmc_pwrseq_simple_power_off,
Why is this needed for a stable patch? It doesn't fix a bug, it just looks like it is a "nice thing" to have, right? I don't think any later patch in this series relies it it, or am I missing something?
thanks,
greg k-h