On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 12:39:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
From: Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com
[ Upstream commit 3ac36aa7307363b7247ccb6f6a804e11496b2b36 ]
memblock_set_node() warns about using MAX_NUMNODES, see
e0eec24e2e19 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES")
for details.
This commit was a fix for e0eec24e2e19, it's not needed for kernels before 6.8.
Reported-by: Narasimhan V Narasimhan.V@amd.com Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich jbeulich@suse.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [bp: commit message] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) bp@alien8.de Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) rppt@kernel.org Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney paulmck@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603141005.23261-1-bp@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/abadb736-a239-49e4-ab42-ace7acdd4278@suse.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 62a119170376b..74a117cbbd3c9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void) for_each_reserved_mem_region(mb_region) { int nid = memblock_get_region_node(mb_region);
if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) node_set(nid, reserved_nodemask);@@ -643,9 +643,9 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void)) nodes_clear(node_online_map); memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo)); WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.memory,
MAX_NUMNODES));
NUMA_NO_NODE));
MAX_NUMNODES));
NUMA_NO_NODE));-- 2.43.0