3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be
commit d935bd50dd14a7714cbdba9a76435dbb56edb1ae upstream.
When a GPIO offset in a lookup table is out-of-range, the printed error message (1) does not include the actual out-of-range value, and (2) contains an off-by-one error in the upper bound.
Avoid user confusion by also printing the actual GPIO offset, and correcting the upper bound of the range. While at it, use "%u" for unsigned int.
Sample impact:
-requested GPIO 0 is out of range [0..32] for chip e6052000.gpio +requested GPIO 0 (45) is out of range [0..31] for chip e6052000.gpio
Fixes: 2a3cf6a3599e9015 ("gpiolib: return -ENOENT if no GPIO mapping exists") Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191127095919.4214-1-geert+renesas@glider.be Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben@decadent.org.uk --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -2743,8 +2743,9 @@ static struct gpio_desc *gpiod_find(stru
if (chip->ngpio <= p->chip_hwnum) { dev_err(dev, - "requested GPIO %d is out of range [0..%d] for chip %s\n", - idx, chip->ngpio, chip->label); + "requested GPIO %u (%u) is out of range [0..%u] for chip %s\n", + idx, p->chip_hwnum, chip->ngpio - 1, + chip->label); return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); }