From: Martin Schiller ms@dev.tdt.de
[ Upstream commit 5f820ed52371b4f5d8c43c93f03408d0dbc01e5b ]
The NETDEV_CHANGENAME code is not "unneeded" like it is stated in commit 4cb6560514fa ("leds: trigger: netdev: fix refcnt leak on interface rename").
The event was accidentally misinterpreted equivalent to NETDEV_UNREGISTER, but should be equivalent to NETDEV_REGISTER.
This was the case in the original code from the openwrt project.
Otherwise, you are unable to set netdev led triggers for (non-existent) netdevices, which has to be renamed. This is the case, for example, for ppp interfaces in openwrt.
Fixes: 06f502f57d0d ("leds: trigger: Introduce a NETDEV trigger") Fixes: 4cb6560514fa ("leds: trigger: netdev: fix refcnt leak on interface rename") Signed-off-by: Martin Schiller ms@dev.tdt.de Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek pavel@ucw.cz Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c index 136f86a1627d1..d5e774d830215 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c +++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c @@ -302,10 +302,12 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, container_of(nb, struct led_netdev_data, notifier);
if (evt != NETDEV_UP && evt != NETDEV_DOWN && evt != NETDEV_CHANGE - && evt != NETDEV_REGISTER && evt != NETDEV_UNREGISTER) + && evt != NETDEV_REGISTER && evt != NETDEV_UNREGISTER + && evt != NETDEV_CHANGENAME) return NOTIFY_DONE;
if (!(dev == trigger_data->net_dev || + (evt == NETDEV_CHANGENAME && !strcmp(dev->name, trigger_data->device_name)) || (evt == NETDEV_REGISTER && !strcmp(dev->name, trigger_data->device_name)))) return NOTIFY_DONE;
@@ -315,6 +317,7 @@ static int netdev_trig_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
clear_bit(NETDEV_LED_MODE_LINKUP, &trigger_data->mode); switch (evt) { + case NETDEV_CHANGENAME: case NETDEV_REGISTER: if (trigger_data->net_dev) dev_put(trigger_data->net_dev);