4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Marchand david.marchand@6wind.com
[ Upstream commit 9fcd67d1772c43d2f23e8fca56acc7219e991676 ]
According to C9-147, MSN should only be incremented when the last packet of a multi packet request has been received.
"Logically, the requester associates a sequential Send Sequence Number (SSN) with each WQE posted to the send queue. The SSN bears a one- to-one relationship to the MSN returned by the responder in each re- sponse packet. Therefore, when the requester receives a response, it in- terprets the MSN as representing the SSN of the most recent request completed by the responder to determine which send WQE(s) can be completed."
Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
Signed-off-by: David Marchand david.marchand@6wind.com Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford dledford@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c @@ -799,18 +799,17 @@ static enum resp_states execute(struct r /* Unreachable */ WARN_ON(1);
- /* We successfully processed this new request. */ - qp->resp.msn++; - /* next expected psn, read handles this separately */ qp->resp.psn = (pkt->psn + 1) & BTH_PSN_MASK;
qp->resp.opcode = pkt->opcode; qp->resp.status = IB_WC_SUCCESS;
- if (pkt->mask & RXE_COMP_MASK) + if (pkt->mask & RXE_COMP_MASK) { + /* We successfully processed this new request. */ + qp->resp.msn++; return RESPST_COMPLETE; - else if (qp_type(qp) == IB_QPT_RC) + } else if (qp_type(qp) == IB_QPT_RC) return RESPST_ACKNOWLEDGE; else return RESPST_CLEANUP;