From: Horatiu Vultur horatiu.vultur@microchip.com
[ Upstream commit 675c807ae26b267233b97cd5006979a6bb8d54d4 ]
When the SW bridge was trying to add/remove entries to/from HW, the access to HW was not protected by any lock. In this way, it was possible to have race conditions. Fix this by using the lan966x->mac_lock to protect parallel access to HW for this cases.
Fixes: 25ee9561ec622 ("net: lan966x: More MAC table functionality") Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur horatiu.vultur@microchip.com Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_mac.c | 34 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_mac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_mac.c index 69e343b7f4af..5893770bfd94 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_mac.c @@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ static struct lan966x_mac_entry *lan966x_mac_find_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct lan966x_mac_entry *res = NULL; struct lan966x_mac_entry *mac_entry;
- spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock); list_for_each_entry(mac_entry, &lan966x->mac_entries, list) { if (mac_entry->vid == vid && ether_addr_equal(mac, mac_entry->mac) && @@ -210,7 +209,6 @@ static struct lan966x_mac_entry *lan966x_mac_find_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, break; } } - spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
return res; } @@ -253,8 +251,11 @@ int lan966x_mac_add_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct lan966x_port *port, { struct lan966x_mac_entry *mac_entry;
- if (lan966x_mac_lookup(lan966x, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_NORMAL)) + spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock); + if (lan966x_mac_lookup(lan966x, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_NORMAL)) { + spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock); return 0; + }
/* In case the entry already exists, don't add it again to SW, * just update HW, but we need to look in the actual HW because @@ -263,21 +264,25 @@ int lan966x_mac_add_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct lan966x_port *port, * add the entry but without the extern_learn flag. */ mac_entry = lan966x_mac_find_entry(lan966x, addr, vid, port->chip_port); - if (mac_entry) - return lan966x_mac_learn(lan966x, port->chip_port, - addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED); + if (mac_entry) { + spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock); + goto mac_learn; + }
mac_entry = lan966x_mac_alloc_entry(addr, vid, port->chip_port); - if (!mac_entry) + if (!mac_entry) { + spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock); return -ENOMEM; + }
- spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock); list_add_tail(&mac_entry->list, &lan966x->mac_entries); spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
- lan966x_mac_learn(lan966x, port->chip_port, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED); lan966x_fdb_call_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED, addr, vid, port->dev);
+mac_learn: + lan966x_mac_learn(lan966x, port->chip_port, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED); + return 0; }
@@ -291,8 +296,9 @@ int lan966x_mac_del_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, const unsigned char *addr, list) { if (mac_entry->vid == vid && ether_addr_equal(addr, mac_entry->mac)) { - lan966x_mac_forget(lan966x, mac_entry->mac, mac_entry->vid, - ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED); + lan966x_mac_forget_locked(lan966x, mac_entry->mac, + mac_entry->vid, + ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED);
list_del(&mac_entry->list); kfree(mac_entry); @@ -428,6 +434,12 @@ static void lan966x_mac_irq_process(struct lan966x *lan966x, u32 row, continue;
spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock); + mac_entry = lan966x_mac_find_entry(lan966x, mac, vid, dest_idx); + if (mac_entry) { + spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock); + continue; + } + mac_entry = lan966x_mac_alloc_entry(mac, vid, dest_idx); if (!mac_entry) { spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);