The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x f448451aa62d54be16acb0034223c17e0d12bc69 # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2024082657-quartered-obtuse-ce45@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
f448451aa62d ("mptcp: pm: remove mptcp_pm_remove_subflow()") ef34a6ea0cab ("mptcp: pm: re-using ID of unused flushed subflows") edd8b5d868a4 ("mptcp: pm: re-using ID of unused removed subflows") 4b317e0eb287 ("mptcp: fix NL PM announced address accounting") 9bbec87ecfe8 ("mptcp: unify pm get_local_id interfaces") dc886bce753c ("mptcp: export local_address") 8b1c94da1e48 ("mptcp: only send RM_ADDR in nl_cmd_remove") c157bbe776b7 ("mptcp: allow the in kernel PM to set MPC subflow priority") d9a4594edabf ("mptcp: netlink: Add MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE") 9ab4807c84a4 ("mptcp: netlink: Add MPTCP_PM_CMD_ANNOUNCE") 982f17ba1a25 ("mptcp: netlink: split mptcp_pm_parse_addr into two functions") 8b20137012d9 ("mptcp: read attributes of addr entries managed by userspace PMs") 4638de5aefe5 ("mptcp: handle local addrs announced by userspace PMs") c682bf536cf4 ("mptcp: add pm_nl_pernet helpers") 4cf86ae84c71 ("mptcp: strict local address ID selection") d045b9eb95a9 ("mptcp: introduce implicit endpoints") 6fa0174a7c86 ("mptcp: more careful RM_ADDR generation") 7d9bf018f907 ("selftests: mptcp: update output info of chk_rm_nr") 90d930882139 ("mptcp: constify a bunch of of helpers") 33397b83eee6 ("selftests: mptcp: add backup with port testcase")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f448451aa62d54be16acb0034223c17e0d12bc69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" matttbe@kernel.org Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:45:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: remove mptcp_pm_remove_subflow()
This helper is confusing. It is in pm.c, but it is specific to the in-kernel PM and it cannot be used by the userspace one. Also, it simply calls one in-kernel specific function with the PM lock, while the similar mptcp_pm_remove_addr() helper requires the PM lock.
What's left is the pr_debug(), which is not that useful, because a similar one is present in the only function called by this helper:
mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received()
After these modifications, this helper can be marked as 'static', and the lock can be taken only once in mptcp_pm_flush_addrs_and_subflows().
Note that it is not a bug fix, but it will help backporting the following commits.
Fixes: 0ee4261a3681 ("mptcp: implement mptcp_pm_remove_subflow") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau martineau@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) matttbe@kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819-net-mptcp-pm-reusing-id-v1-7-38035d40de5b@... Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c index 23bb89c94e90..925123e99889 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c @@ -60,16 +60,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_remove_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_ return 0; }
-int mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list) -{ - pr_debug("msk=%p, rm_list_nr=%d", msk, rm_list->nr); - - spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); - mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, rm_list); - spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); - return 0; -} - /* path manager event handlers */
void mptcp_pm_new_connection(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct sock *ssk, int server_side) diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index 2c26696b820e..44fc1c5959ac 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -857,8 +857,8 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk) mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, &msk->pm.rm_list_rx, MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR); }
-void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk, - const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list) +static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk, + const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list) { mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_or_subflow(msk, rm_list, MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW); } @@ -1471,7 +1471,9 @@ static int mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr(struct net *net, !(entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT));
if (remove_subflow) { - mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(msk, &list); + spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); + mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &list); + spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); } else if (entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW) { /* If the subflow has been used, but now closed */ spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); @@ -1617,18 +1619,14 @@ static void mptcp_pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows(struct mptcp_sock *msk, alist.ids[alist.nr++] = entry->addr.id; }
+ spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); if (alist.nr) { - spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); msk->pm.add_addr_signaled -= alist.nr; mptcp_pm_remove_addr(msk, &alist); - spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); } - if (slist.nr) - mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(msk, &slist); - + mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(msk, &slist); /* Reset counters: maybe some subflows have been removed before */ - spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); bitmap_fill(msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap, MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1); msk->pm.local_addr_used = 0; spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h index 60c6b073d65f..a1c1b0ff1ce1 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h @@ -1026,7 +1026,6 @@ int mptcp_pm_announce_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_addr_info *addr, bool echo); int mptcp_pm_remove_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list); -int mptcp_pm_remove_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk, const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list); void mptcp_pm_remove_addrs(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct list_head *rm_list);
void mptcp_free_local_addr_list(struct mptcp_sock *msk); @@ -1133,8 +1132,6 @@ static inline u8 subflow_get_local_id(const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflo
void __init mptcp_pm_nl_init(void); void mptcp_pm_nl_work(struct mptcp_sock *msk); -void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk, - const struct mptcp_rm_list *rm_list); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_signal_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk); unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk);
Hi Greg,
On 26/08/2024 14:05, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Thank you for the notification!
(...)
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f448451aa62d54be16acb0034223c17e0d12bc69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" matttbe@kernel.org Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:45:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mptcp: pm: remove mptcp_pm_remove_subflow()
This helper is confusing. It is in pm.c, but it is specific to the in-kernel PM and it cannot be used by the userspace one. Also, it simply calls one in-kernel specific function with the PM lock, while the similar mptcp_pm_remove_addr() helper requires the PM lock.
What's left is the pr_debug(), which is not that useful, because a similar one is present in the only function called by this helper:
mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received()
After these modifications, this helper can be marked as 'static', and the lock can be taken only once in mptcp_pm_flush_addrs_and_subflows().
Note that it is not a bug fix, but it will help backporting the following commits.
It was helping with newer versions, but not here in v5.10, because other fixes have not been taken. We don't need this patch then.
Cheers, Matt
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org