This commit landed in Linux v5.16, and should have been back-ported to stable branches: 0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
It has three hunks, and the commit can be cherry-picked directly into the 5.15.y and 5.10.y stable branches. The first hunk fixes a problem first introduced in Linux v5.2, so that hunk (only) should be back-ported to v5.4.y.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder elder@linaro.org
Is there anything further I need to do? If you'd prefer I send patches, I can do that also (just ask). Thanks.
-Alex
Rob's original fix in Linus' tree: 0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells This first landed in v5.16.
The commit that introduced the problem in the first hunk: b84dfd175c098 arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add PCIe PHY and RC nodes This first landed in v5.2, so back-port to v5.4.y, v5.10.y, v5.15.y.
The commit that introduced the problem in the second hunk: 5c538e09cb19b arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add first PCIe controller and PHY This first landed in v5.7, so back-port to v5.10.y, v5.15.y
The commit that introduced the problem in the third hunk: 42ad231338c14 arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add second PCIe PHY and controller This first landed in v5.7 also
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:50:05PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
This commit landed in Linux v5.16, and should have been back-ported to stable branches: 0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
It has three hunks, and the commit can be cherry-picked directly into the 5.15.y and 5.10.y stable branches. The first hunk fixes a problem first introduced in Linux v5.2, so that hunk (only) should be back-ported to v5.4.y.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder elder@linaro.org
Is there anything further I need to do? If you'd prefer I send patches, I can do that also (just ask). Thanks.
-AlexRob's original fix in Linus' tree: 0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells This first landed in v5.16.
The commit that introduced the problem in the first hunk: b84dfd175c098 arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add PCIe PHY and RC nodes This first landed in v5.2, so back-port to v5.4.y, v5.10.y, v5.15.y.
The commit that introduced the problem in the second hunk: 5c538e09cb19b arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add first PCIe controller and PHY This first landed in v5.7, so back-port to v5.10.y, v5.15.y
The commit that introduced the problem in the third hunk: 42ad231338c14 arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add second PCIe PHY and controller This first landed in v5.7 also
I'm confused, I applied this to 5.10.y and 5.15.y now, but it did not apply to 5.4.y, and I did not understand the "first-third" type comments about hunks here, sorry. Can you just provide a working backport for 5.4.y?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 5/13/24 8:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 02:50:05PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
This commit landed in Linux v5.16, and should have been back-ported to stable branches: 0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells
It has three hunks, and the commit can be cherry-picked directly into the 5.15.y and 5.10.y stable branches. The first hunk fixes a problem first introduced in Linux v5.2, so that hunk (only) should be back-ported to v5.4.y.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder elder@linaro.org
Is there anything further I need to do? If you'd prefer I send patches, I can do that also (just ask). Thanks.
-AlexRob's original fix in Linus' tree: 0ac10b291bee8 arm64: dts: qcom: Fix 'interrupt-map' parent address cells This first landed in v5.16.
The commit that introduced the problem in the first hunk: b84dfd175c098 arm64: dts: qcom: msm8998: Add PCIe PHY and RC nodes This first landed in v5.2, so back-port to v5.4.y, v5.10.y, v5.15.y.
The commit that introduced the problem in the second hunk: 5c538e09cb19b arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add first PCIe controller and PHY This first landed in v5.7, so back-port to v5.10.y, v5.15.y
The commit that introduced the problem in the third hunk: 42ad231338c14 arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add second PCIe PHY and controller This first landed in v5.7 also
I'm confused, I applied this to 5.10.y and 5.15.y now, but it did not apply to 5.4.y, and I did not understand the "first-third" type comments about hunks here, sorry. Can you just provide a working backport for 5.4.y?
Yes, I will. It might be a few days. -Alex
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Alex Elder -
Alex Elder -
Greg KH