From: Siddh Raman Pant code@siddh.me
[ Upstream commit 6ec0d7527c4287369b52df3bcefd21a0c4fb2b7c ]
As we know we cannot send the datagram (state can be set to LLCP_CLOSED by nfc_llcp_socket_release()), there is no need to proceed further.
Thus, bail out early from llcp_sock_sendmsg().
Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant code@siddh.me Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Suman Ghosh sumang@marvell.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c index 6e1fba2084930..fd643a1d39bc6 100644 --- a/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c +++ b/net/nfc/llcp_sock.c @@ -798,6 +798,11 @@ static int llcp_sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, }
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM) { + if (sk->sk_state != LLCP_BOUND) { + release_sock(sk); + return -ENOTCONN; + } + DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_nfc_llcp *, addr, msg->msg_name);
From: Sarannya S quic_sarannya@quicinc.com
[ Upstream commit 9bf2e9165f90dc9f416af53c902be7e33930f728 ]
When a 'DEL_CLIENT' message is received from the remote, the corresponding server port gets deleted. A DEL_SERVER message is then announced for this server. As part of handling the subsequent DEL_SERVER message, the name- server attempts to delete the server port which results in a '-ENOENT' error. The return value from server_del() is then propagated back to qrtr_ns_worker, causing excessive error prints. To address this, return 0 from control_cmd_del_server() without checking the return value of server_del(), since the above scenario is not an error case and hence server_del() doesn't have any other error return value.
Signed-off-by: Sarannya Sasikumar quic_sarannya@quicinc.com Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms@kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/qrtr/ns.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/qrtr/ns.c b/net/qrtr/ns.c index 713e9940d88bb..c92dd960bfefa 100644 --- a/net/qrtr/ns.c +++ b/net/qrtr/ns.c @@ -577,7 +577,9 @@ static int ctrl_cmd_del_server(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from, if (!node) return -ENOENT;
- return server_del(node, port, true); + server_del(node, port, true); + + return 0; }
static int ctrl_cmd_new_lookup(struct sockaddr_qrtr *from,
From: Stefan Wahren wahrenst@gmx.net
[ Upstream commit 643fe70e7bcdcc9e2d96952f7fc2bab56385cce5 ]
of_property_match_string returns an int; either an index from 0 or greater if successful or negative on failure. Even it's very unlikely that the DT CPU node contains multiple enable-methods these checks should be fixed.
This patch was inspired by the work of Nick Desaulniers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230516-sunxi-v1-1-ac4b9651a8c1@google.com/T/ Cc: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren wahrenst@gmx.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231228193903.9078-2-wahrenst@gmx.net Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai wens@csie.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c index 26cbce1353387..5d7ddfd5990e5 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c @@ -804,14 +804,14 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sunxi_mc_smp_data); i++) { ret = of_property_match_string(node, "enable-method", sunxi_mc_smp_data[i].enable_method); - if (!ret) + if (ret >= 0) break; }
is_a83t = sunxi_mc_smp_data[i].is_a83t;
of_node_put(node); - if (ret) + if (ret < 0) return -ENODEV;
if (!sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_table_init())
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Sasha Levin