The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 969f5ea627570e91c9d54403287ee3ed657f58fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:03:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: errata: Add workaround for Cortex-A76 erratum #1463225
Revisions of the Cortex-A76 CPU prior to r4p0 are affected by an erratum that can prevent interrupts from being taken when single-stepping.
This patch implements a software workaround to prevent userspace from effectively being able to disable interrupts.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marc Zyngier marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt index 68d9b74fd751..b29a32805ad0 100644 --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ stable kernels. | ARM | Cortex-A76 | #1165522 | ARM64_ERRATUM_1165522 | | ARM | Cortex-A76 | #1286807 | ARM64_ERRATUM_1286807 | | ARM | Neoverse-N1 | #1188873 | ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 | +| ARM | Cortex-A76 | #1463225 | ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 | | ARM | MMU-500 | #841119,#826419 | N/A | | | | | | | Cavium | ThunderX ITS | #22375, #24313 | CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375 | diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 4780eb7af842..5d99f492869b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -520,6 +520,24 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_1286807
If unsure, say Y.
+config ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 + bool "Cortex-A76: Software Step might prevent interrupt recognition" + default y + help + This option adds a workaround for Arm Cortex-A76 erratum 1463225. + + On the affected Cortex-A76 cores (r0p0 to r3p1), software stepping + of a system call instruction (SVC) can prevent recognition of + subsequent interrupts when software stepping is disabled in the + exception handler of the system call and either kernel debugging + is enabled or VHE is in use. + + Work around the erratum by triggering a dummy step exception + when handling a system call from a task that is being stepped + in a VHE configuration of the kernel. + + If unsure, say Y. + config CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375 bool "Cavium erratum 22375, 24313" default y diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h index defdc67d9ab4..73faee64e498 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ #define ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_IMP_DEF 41 #define ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING 42 #define ARM64_HAS_DCPODP 43 +#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_1463225 44
-#define ARM64_NCAPS 44 +#define ARM64_NCAPS 45
#endif /* __ASM_CPUCAPS_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c index e88d4e7bdfc7..ac6432bfc1e4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c @@ -502,6 +502,22 @@ static const struct midr_range arm64_ssb_cpus[] = { {}, };
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __in_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_wa); + +static bool +has_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, + int scope) +{ + u32 midr = read_cpuid_id(); + /* Cortex-A76 r0p0 - r3p1 */ + struct midr_range range = MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A76, 0, 0, 3, 1); + + WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible()); + return is_midr_in_range(midr, &range) && is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(); +} +#endif + static void __maybe_unused cpu_enable_cache_maint_trap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused) { @@ -823,6 +839,14 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = { .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_1165522, ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A76, 0, 0, 2, 0), }, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 + { + .desc = "ARM erratum 1463225", + .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_1463225, + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM, + .matches = has_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225, + }, #endif { } diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c index 5610ac01c1ec..871c739f060a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <asm/daifflags.h> +#include <asm/debug-monitors.h> #include <asm/fpsimd.h> #include <asm/syscall.h> #include <asm/thread_info.h> @@ -60,6 +61,35 @@ static inline bool has_syscall_work(unsigned long flags) int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs); void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 +DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __in_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_wa); + +static void cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_svc_handler(void) +{ + u32 reg, val; + + if (!unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))) + return; + + if (!unlikely(this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1463225))) + return; + + __this_cpu_write(__in_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_wa, 1); + reg = read_sysreg(mdscr_el1); + val = reg | DBG_MDSCR_SS | DBG_MDSCR_KDE; + write_sysreg(val, mdscr_el1); + asm volatile("msr daifclr, #8"); + isb(); + + /* We will have taken a single-step exception by this point */ + + write_sysreg(reg, mdscr_el1); + __this_cpu_write(__in_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_wa, 0); +} +#else +static void cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_svc_handler(void) { } +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 */ + static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr, const syscall_fn_t syscall_table[]) { @@ -68,6 +98,7 @@ static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr, regs->orig_x0 = regs->regs[0]; regs->syscallno = scno;
+ cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_svc_handler(); local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX); user_exit();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c index 0cb0e09995e1..9a84a4071561 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c @@ -810,6 +810,36 @@ void __init hook_debug_fault_code(int nr, debug_fault_info[nr].name = name; }
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 +DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __in_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_wa); + +static int __exception +cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + if (user_mode(regs)) + return 0; + + if (!__this_cpu_read(__in_cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_wa)) + return 0; + + /* + * We've taken a dummy step exception from the kernel to ensure + * that interrupts are re-enabled on the syscall path. Return back + * to cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_svc_handler() with debug exceptions + * masked so that we can safely restore the mdscr and get on with + * handling the syscall. + */ + regs->pstate |= PSR_D_BIT; + return 1; +} +#else +static int __exception +cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_1463225 */ + asmlinkage void __exception do_debug_exception(unsigned long addr_if_watchpoint, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) @@ -817,6 +847,9 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_debug_exception(unsigned long addr_if_watchpoint, const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_debug_fault_info(esr); unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
+ if (cortex_a76_erratum_1463225_debug_handler(regs)) + return; + /* * Tell lockdep we disabled irqs in entry.S. Do nothing if they were * already disabled to preserve the last enabled/disabled addresses.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:54:40PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Urgh. I'm going to punt on this unless somebody requests a backport to a kernel prior to 4.19 explicitly. The issue is that our syscall entry code was moved to C after 4.14 and this workaround relies heavily on that work. A backport would therefore necessitate a rewrite of the workaround that hooks the assembly directly. Whilst do-able, I'd rather know that (a) somebody wants this (b) they plan to deploy it on real devices and (c) they can help to test.
Sound reasonable?
Will
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:44:09PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:54:40PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
Urgh. I'm going to punt on this unless somebody requests a backport to a kernel prior to 4.19 explicitly. The issue is that our syscall entry code was moved to C after 4.14 and this workaround relies heavily on that work. A backport would therefore necessitate a rewrite of the workaround that hooks the assembly directly. Whilst do-able, I'd rather know that (a) somebody wants this (b) they plan to deploy it on real devices and (c) they can help to test.
Sound reasonable?
Sounds fine to me. Thanks for the backports you did send, I've queued them up now.
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org