The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x ded103c7eb23753f22597afa500a7c1ad34116ba # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '2024042909-whimsical-drapery-40d1@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
ded103c7eb23 ("kbuild: rust: force `alloc` extern to allow "empty" Rust files") 295d8398c67e ("kbuild: specify output names separately for each emission type from rustc") 16169a47d5c3 ("kbuild: refactor host*_flags")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ded103c7eb23753f22597afa500a7c1ad34116ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miguel Ojeda ojeda@kernel.org Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:06:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] kbuild: rust: force `alloc` extern to allow "empty" Rust files
If one attempts to build an essentially empty file somewhere in the kernel tree, it leads to a build error because the compiler does not recognize the `new_uninit` unstable feature:
error[E0635]: unknown feature `new_uninit` --> <crate attribute>:1:9 | 1 | feature(new_uninit) | ^^^^^^^^^^
The reason is that we pass `-Zcrate-attr='feature(new_uninit)'` (together with `-Zallow-features=new_uninit`) to let non-`rust/` code use that unstable feature.
However, the compiler only recognizes the feature if the `alloc` crate is resolved (the feature is an `alloc` one). `--extern alloc`, which we pass, is not enough to resolve the crate.
Introducing a reference like `use alloc;` or `extern crate alloc;` solves the issue, thus this is not seen in normal files. For instance, `use`ing the `kernel` prelude introduces such a reference, since `alloc` is used inside.
While normal use of the build system is not impacted by this, it can still be fairly confusing for kernel developers [1], thus use the unstable `force` option of `--extern` [2] (added in Rust 1.71 [3]) to force the compiler to resolve `alloc`.
This new unstable feature is only needed meanwhile we use the other unstable feature, since then we will not need `-Zcrate-attr`.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+ Reported-by: Daniel Almeida daniel.almeida@collabora.com Reported-by: Julian Stecklina julian.stecklina@cyberus-technology.de Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/288089-General/topic/x/n... [1] Fixes: 2f7ab1267dc9 ("Kbuild: add Rust support") Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111302 [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109421 [3] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl aliceryhl@google.com Reviewed-by: Gary Guo gary@garyguo.net Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422090644.525520-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda ojeda@kernel.org
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build index baf86c0880b6..533a7799fdfe 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile.build +++ b/scripts/Makefile.build @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ rust_common_cmd = \ -Zallow-features=$(rust_allowed_features) \ -Zcrate-attr=no_std \ -Zcrate-attr='feature($(rust_allowed_features))' \ - --extern alloc --extern kernel \ + -Zunstable-options --extern force:alloc --extern kernel \ --crate-type rlib -L $(objtree)/rust/ \ --crate-name $(basename $(notdir $@)) \ --sysroot=/dev/null \
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
Yeah, this one was only intended for 6.6+:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
Was the annotation above incorrect?
Thanks!
Cheers, Miguel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 01:25:37PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
Yeah, this one was only intended for 6.6+:
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
Was the annotation above incorrect?
That was, but you also say: Fixes: 2f7ab1267dc9 ("Kbuild: add Rust support") which is in 6.1, so what am I supposed to believe?
Hence the email :)
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:37 PM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
That was, but you also say: Fixes: 2f7ab1267dc9 ("Kbuild: add Rust support") which is in 6.1, so what am I supposed to believe?
Hence the email :)
Ah, I see. I thought the annotation "overrides" what could be found automatically via the `Fixes`.
Let me send them manually then.
Thanks!
Cheers, Miguel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:22 PM Miguel Ojeda miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com wrote:
Let me send them manually then.
I see you queued them already for 6.6.y and 6.8.y -- thanks!
Cheers, Miguel
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 02:22:13PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:37 PM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
That was, but you also say: Fixes: 2f7ab1267dc9 ("Kbuild: add Rust support") which is in 6.1, so what am I supposed to believe?
Hence the email :)
Ah, I see. I thought the annotation "overrides" what could be found automatically via the `Fixes`.
When things are confusing, I punt and ask for what to do, especially because people put commit ids in Fixes and don't always know how far back those commits really were applied to.
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org