On 2025-08-12 16:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Applied as 6.17-rc material and sorry for the delay (I was offline).
Thanks!
Thanks!
Tagging stable@ so we're hopefully in time for 6.16.1.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 06:51:10PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
On 2025-08-12 16:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Applied as 6.17-rc material and sorry for the delay (I was offline).
Thanks!
Thanks!
Tagging stable@ so we're hopefully in time for 6.16.1.
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Am 12.08.25 um 18:40 schrieb Greg KH:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 06:51:10PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
On 2025-08-12 16:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Applied as 6.17-rc material and sorry for the delay (I was offline).
Thanks!
Thanks!
Tagging stable@ so we're hopefully in time for 6.16.1.
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Agree.
AFAIK the Fixes: tag should be enough to ensure that this patch gets included in the affected stable kernels.
Thanks, Armin Wolf
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 06:54:39PM +0200, Armin Wolf wrote:
Am 12.08.25 um 18:40 schrieb Greg KH:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 06:51:10PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
On 2025-08-12 16:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Applied as 6.17-rc material and sorry for the delay (I was offline).
Thanks!
Thanks!
Tagging stable@ so we're hopefully in time for 6.16.1.
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Agree.
AFAIK the Fixes: tag should be enough to ensure that this patch gets included in the affected stable kernels.
Not at all!
Please read the above link for the full details on how to do this (hint, Fixes: will not do it.)
thanks,
greg k-h
On 2025-08-12 20:10, Greg KH wrote:
Please read the above link for the full details on how to do this (hint, Fixes: will not do it.)
I might be missing something, but doesn't that just tell you to CC stable@? Or do you have to specifically have the CC on the initial patch submission, not anywhere in the thread?
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 7:57 PM Ilya K me@0upti.me wrote:
On 2025-08-12 20:10, Greg KH wrote:
Please read the above link for the full details on how to do this (hint, Fixes: will not do it.)
I might be missing something, but doesn't that just tell you to CC stable@? Or do you have to specifically have the CC on the initial patch submission, not anywhere in the thread?
A Cc: stable in a patch (or elsewhere in the thread following it) is just a hint for the maintainer anyway.
But no worries, I've added Cc: stable to the commit.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 08:56:55PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
On 2025-08-12 20:10, Greg KH wrote:
Please read the above link for the full details on how to do this (hint, Fixes: will not do it.)
I might be missing something, but doesn't that just tell you to CC stable@?
It must be in the patch itself, in the signed-off-by area.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 9:33 PM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 08:56:55PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
On 2025-08-12 20:10, Greg KH wrote:
Please read the above link for the full details on how to do this (hint, Fixes: will not do it.)
I might be missing something, but doesn't that just tell you to CC stable@?
It must be in the patch itself, in the signed-off-by area.
Well, to be precise, it must be present in the mainline commit of that patch and whether or not it will be there is entirely up to the committer.
So adding a Cc: stable tag to a patch is a hint, which usually is appreciated as long as it is accurate, but the committer may still decide to not include it in the commit.
Am 12.08.25 um 19:10 schrieb Greg KH:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 06:54:39PM +0200, Armin Wolf wrote:
Am 12.08.25 um 18:40 schrieb Greg KH:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 06:51:10PM +0300, Ilya K wrote:
On 2025-08-12 16:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Applied as 6.17-rc material and sorry for the delay (I was offline).
Thanks!
Thanks!
Tagging stable@ so we're hopefully in time for 6.16.1.
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Agree.
AFAIK the Fixes: tag should be enough to ensure that this patch gets included in the affected stable kernels.
Not at all!
Please read the above link for the full details on how to do this (hint, Fixes: will not do it.)
thanks,
greg k-h
Oops, seems that i missed something rather significant about the stable kernels. I will give keep that in mind when sending future patches.
Thanks, Armin Wolf
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Armin Wolf -
Greg KH -
Ilya K -
Rafael J. Wysocki