Hi Greg,
the issue might be due to this patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
2024-02-23T15:39:05.6297767Z CC kernel/sys_ni.o 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7583048Z security/apparmor/af_unix.c: In function ‘unix_state_double_lock’: 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7586076Z security/apparmor/af_unix.c:583:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘unix_state_lock_nested’ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7588374Z 583 | unix_state_lock_nested(sk2); 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7589913Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7591564Z In file included from security/apparmor/include/af_unix.h:15, 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7593341Z from security/apparmor/af_unix.c:17: 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7594989Z ./include/net/af_unix.h:77:20: note: declared here 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7596733Z 77 | static inline void unix_state_lock_nested(struct sock *sk, 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7598516Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7600862Z security/apparmor/af_unix.c:586:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘unix_state_lock_nested’ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7603177Z 586 | unix_state_lock_nested(sk1); 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7605189Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7606765Z ./include/net/af_unix.h:77:20: note: declared here 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7608497Z 77 | static inline void unix_state_lock_nested(struct sock *sk, 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7610208Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.8002385Z make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:262: security/apparmor/af_unix.o] Error 1 2024-02-23T15:39:05.8005077Z make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... 2024-02-23T15:39:05.8094726Z CC crypto/scatterwalk.o 2024-02-23T15:39:05.9082621Z CC [M] fs/btrfs/sysfs.o 2024-02-23T15:39:06.2502316Z CC kernel/nsproxy.o 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4094246Z make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:497: security/apparmor] Error 2 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4207119Z make: *** [Makefile:1750: security] Error 2 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4208636Z CC kernel/notifier.o 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4210296Z make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... 2024-02-23T15:39:06.8604827Z CC crypto/proc.o
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:18:40PM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
Hi Greg,
the issue might be due to this patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
2024-02-23T15:39:05.6297767Z CC kernel/sys_ni.o 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7583048Z security/apparmor/af_unix.c: In function ‘unix_state_double_lock’: 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7586076Z security/apparmor/af_unix.c:583:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘unix_state_lock_nested’ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7588374Z 583 | unix_state_lock_nested(sk2); 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7589913Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7591564Z In file included from security/apparmor/include/af_unix.h:15, 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7593341Z from security/apparmor/af_unix.c:17: 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7594989Z ./include/net/af_unix.h:77:20: note: declared here 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7596733Z 77 | static inline void unix_state_lock_nested(struct sock *sk, 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7598516Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7600862Z security/apparmor/af_unix.c:586:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘unix_state_lock_nested’ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7603177Z 586 | unix_state_lock_nested(sk1); 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7605189Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7606765Z ./include/net/af_unix.h:77:20: note: declared here 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7608497Z 77 | static inline void unix_state_lock_nested(struct sock *sk, 2024-02-23T15:39:05.7610208Z | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2024-02-23T15:39:05.8002385Z make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:262: security/apparmor/af_unix.o] Error 1 2024-02-23T15:39:05.8005077Z make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... 2024-02-23T15:39:05.8094726Z CC crypto/scatterwalk.o 2024-02-23T15:39:05.9082621Z CC [M] fs/btrfs/sysfs.o 2024-02-23T15:39:06.2502316Z CC kernel/nsproxy.o 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4094246Z make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:497: security/apparmor] Error 2 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4207119Z make: *** [Makefile:1750: security] Error 2 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4208636Z CC kernel/notifier.o 2024-02-23T15:39:06.4210296Z make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... 2024-02-23T15:39:06.8604827Z CC crypto/proc.o
Odd line wrapping :(
Anyway, what config options are you using? I can't see this here and none of the CI systems caught it either.
thanks,
greg k-h
On 24/02/2024 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Odd line wrapping :(
Anyway, what config options are you using? I can't see this here and none of the CI systems caught it either.
thanks,
greg k-h
The config should be this one:
https://gitlab.manjaro.org/packages/core/linux54/-/blob/cb28712a0dd32966c25b...
Latest functional build was 5.4.268:
https://github.com/manjaro-kernels/linux54/releases
Full build log of 5.4.269 can be found here:
https://pipelinesghubeus25.actions.githubusercontent.com/IX0HkTGyy7sqAEfMIwU...
I will check if reverting the patch I think might create this issue might fix it. Let's see ...
On 26/02/2024 11:28, Philip Müller wrote:
Full build log of 5.4.269 can be found here:
https://pipelinesghubeus25.actions.githubusercontent.com/IX0HkTGyy7sqAEfMIwU...
Seems github has some session tokens which expire. Log download should be possible thru here:
https://github.com/manjaro-kernels/linux54/suites/21057183037/logs?attempt=1
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:28:33AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
On 24/02/2024 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Odd line wrapping :(
Anyway, what config options are you using? I can't see this here and none of the CI systems caught it either.
thanks,
greg k-h
The config should be this one:
https://gitlab.manjaro.org/packages/core/linux54/-/blob/cb28712a0dd32966c25b...
Ah, here's the config, let me go test...
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:28:33AM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
On 24/02/2024 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Odd line wrapping :(
Anyway, what config options are you using? I can't see this here and none of the CI systems caught it either.
thanks,
greg k-h
The config should be this one:
https://gitlab.manjaro.org/packages/core/linux54/-/blob/cb28712a0dd32966c25b...
Ah, here's the config, let me go test...
This config builds just fine for me here. Are you sure this isn't some out-of-tree change you have in your tree? I'm going to need more information here as no one seems to be able to reproduce the issue...
thanks,
greg k-h
On 24/02/2024 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
the issue might be due to this patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
Yes, reverting this commit makes it build again on my end ...
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:05:16PM +0700, Philip Müller wrote:
On 24/02/2024 16:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
the issue might be due to this patch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree...
Yes, reverting this commit makes it build again on my end ...
Can you attach a .config file that shows this? I can't seem to duplicate it here.
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org