The original patch was created way before the .dts movement on arch/arm. But it was patch merged after the .dts reorganization. Fix the arch/arm paths accordingly.
Fixes: 7564efb37346a ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for TQ-Systems device trees and drivers") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com --- MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c36d72143b995..762e97653aa3c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -22930,9 +22930,9 @@ TQ SYSTEMS BOARD & DRIVER SUPPORT L: linux@ew.tq-group.com S: Supported W: https://www.tq-group.com/en/products/tq-embedded/ -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*mba*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*tqma*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/mba*.dtsi +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*mba*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*tqma*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/mba*.dtsi F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-*tqml*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*mba*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*tqma*.dts*
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
The original patch was created way before the .dts movement on arch/arm. But it was patch merged after the .dts reorganization. Fix the arch/arm paths accordingly.
Fixes: 7564efb37346a ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for TQ-Systems device trees and drivers") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c36d72143b995..762e97653aa3c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -22930,9 +22930,9 @@ TQ SYSTEMS BOARD & DRIVER SUPPORT L: linux@ew.tq-group.com S: Supported W: https://www.tq-group.com/en/products/tq-embedded/ -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*mba*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*tqma*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/mba*.dtsi +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*mba*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*tqma*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/mba*.dtsi F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-*tqml*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*mba*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*tqma*.dts* -- 2.34.1
Why is a MAINTAINERS change needed for stable kernels?
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 14:18:35 CEST schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
The original patch was created way before the .dts movement on arch/arm. But it was patch merged after the .dts reorganization. Fix the arch/arm paths accordingly.
Fixes: 7564efb37346a ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for TQ-Systems device trees and drivers") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c36d72143b995..762e97653aa3c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -22930,9 +22930,9 @@ TQ SYSTEMS BOARD & DRIVER SUPPORT L: linux@ew.tq-group.com S: Supported W: https://www.tq-group.com/en/products/tq-embedded/ -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*mba*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*tqma*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/mba*.dtsi +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*mba*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*tqma*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/mba*.dtsi F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-*tqml*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*mba*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*tqma*.dts*
Why is a MAINTAINERS change needed for stable kernels?
This fixes the original commit introducing these entries, mainlined in v6.6 Unfortunately that got delayed so much it was merged after commit 724ba67515320 ("ARM: dts: Move .dts files to vendor sub-directories"), which was merged in v6.5. Thus the (32-Bit) arm DT paths are incorrect from the very beginning.
Best regards, Alexander
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 14:18:35 CEST schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
The original patch was created way before the .dts movement on arch/arm. But it was patch merged after the .dts reorganization. Fix the arch/arm paths accordingly.
Fixes: 7564efb37346a ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for TQ-Systems device trees and drivers") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c36d72143b995..762e97653aa3c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -22930,9 +22930,9 @@ TQ SYSTEMS BOARD & DRIVER SUPPORT L: linux@ew.tq-group.com S: Supported W: https://www.tq-group.com/en/products/tq-embedded/ -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*mba*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*tqma*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/mba*.dtsi +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*mba*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*tqma*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/mba*.dtsi F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-*tqml*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*mba*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*tqma*.dts*
Why is a MAINTAINERS change needed for stable kernels?
This fixes the original commit introducing these entries, mainlined in v6.6 Unfortunately that got delayed so much it was merged after commit 724ba67515320 ("ARM: dts: Move .dts files to vendor sub-directories"), which was merged in v6.5. Thus the (32-Bit) arm DT paths are incorrect from the very beginning.
That's fine, who is using these paths on older kernels anyway? You should always be doing development on the latest kernel tree, so they shouldn't matter here.
or am I missing something?
thanks,
greg k-h
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 14:37:09 CEST schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 14:18:35 CEST schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
The original patch was created way before the .dts movement on arch/arm. But it was patch merged after the .dts reorganization. Fix the arch/arm paths accordingly.
Fixes: 7564efb37346a ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for TQ-Systems device trees and drivers") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c36d72143b995..762e97653aa3c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -22930,9 +22930,9 @@ TQ SYSTEMS BOARD & DRIVER SUPPORT L: linux@ew.tq-group.com S: Supported W: https://www.tq-group.com/en/products/tq-embedded/ -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*mba*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*tqma*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/mba*.dtsi +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*mba*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*tqma*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/mba*.dtsi F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-*tqml*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*mba*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*tqma*.dts*
Why is a MAINTAINERS change needed for stable kernels?
This fixes the original commit introducing these entries, mainlined in v6.6 Unfortunately that got delayed so much it was merged after commit 724ba67515320 ("ARM: dts: Move .dts files to vendor sub-directories"), which was merged in v6.5. Thus the (32-Bit) arm DT paths are incorrect from the very beginning.
That's fine, who is using these paths on older kernels anyway? You should always be doing development on the latest kernel tree, so they shouldn't matter here.
or am I missing something?
Sure development is on newer trees, but I'm wondering if anyone uses scripts on that stable version evaluating this file. I don't mind if this is not applied to stable. Want me to send without Fixes and CC tag?
Best regards, Alexander
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 03:40:54PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 14:37:09 CEST schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2024, 14:18:35 CEST schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
The original patch was created way before the .dts movement on arch/arm. But it was patch merged after the .dts reorganization. Fix the arch/arm paths accordingly.
Fixes: 7564efb37346a ("MAINTAINERS: Add entry for TQ-Systems device trees and drivers") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c36d72143b995..762e97653aa3c 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -22930,9 +22930,9 @@ TQ SYSTEMS BOARD & DRIVER SUPPORT L: linux@ew.tq-group.com S: Supported W: https://www.tq-group.com/en/products/tq-embedded/ -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*mba*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/imx*tqma*.dts* -F: arch/arm/boot/dts/mba*.dtsi +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*mba*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx*tqma*.dts* +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/mba*.dtsi F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-*tqml*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*mba*.dts* F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx*tqma*.dts*
Why is a MAINTAINERS change needed for stable kernels?
This fixes the original commit introducing these entries, mainlined in v6.6 Unfortunately that got delayed so much it was merged after commit 724ba67515320 ("ARM: dts: Move .dts files to vendor sub-directories"), which was merged in v6.5. Thus the (32-Bit) arm DT paths are incorrect from the very beginning.
That's fine, who is using these paths on older kernels anyway? You should always be doing development on the latest kernel tree, so they shouldn't matter here.
or am I missing something?
Sure development is on newer trees, but I'm wondering if anyone uses scripts on that stable version evaluating this file.
Usually not, otherwise we would be backporting all of these types of changes all the time.
I don't mind if this is not applied to stable. Want me to send without Fixes and CC tag?
Please do, thanks!
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Alexander Stein -
Greg KH