Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 9c0863b1cc48 [media] vb2: call buf_finish from __queue_cancel.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.5, v4.19.18, v4.14.96, v4.9.153, v4.4.172, v3.18.133.
v4.20.5: Build OK! v4.19.18: Build OK! v4.14.96: Build OK! v4.9.153: Build OK! v4.4.172: Build OK! v3.18.133: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5d0fd3c806b9 ("[media] uvcvideo: Disable hardware timestamps by default")
How should we proceed with this patch?
-- Thanks, Sasha
Hi Sasha,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:04:48AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 9c0863b1cc48 [media] vb2: call buf_finish from __queue_cancel.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.5, v4.19.18, v4.14.96, v4.9.153, v4.4.172, v3.18.133.
v4.20.5: Build OK! v4.19.18: Build OK! v4.14.96: Build OK! v4.9.153: Build OK! v4.4.172: Build OK! v3.18.133: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5d0fd3c806b9 ("[media] uvcvideo: Disable hardware timestamps by default")
How should we proceed with this patch?
IMO 5d0fd3c806b9 should be applied as well. It's effectively a bugfix as well (but which also, for most users, covered the problem fixed by 9c0863b1cc48).
Laurent, could you confirm?
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:31:07AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:04:48AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 9c0863b1cc48 [media] vb2: call buf_finish from __queue_cancel.
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.5, v4.19.18, v4.14.96, v4.9.153, v4.4.172, v3.18.133.
v4.20.5: Build OK! v4.19.18: Build OK! v4.14.96: Build OK! v4.9.153: Build OK! v4.4.172: Build OK! v3.18.133: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 5d0fd3c806b9 ("[media] uvcvideo: Disable hardware timestamps by default")
How should we proceed with this patch?
IMO 5d0fd3c806b9 should be applied as well. It's effectively a bugfix as well (but which also, for most users, covered the problem fixed by 9c0863b1cc48).
Laurent, could you confirm?
That seems good to me.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org