Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.7, v5.0.21, v4.19.48, v4.14.123, v4.9.180, v4.4.180.
v5.1.7: Build OK! v5.0.21: Build OK! v4.19.48: Build OK! v4.14.123: Build OK! v4.9.180: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
v4.4.180: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:635:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
How should we proceed with this patch?
-- Thanks, Sasha
On Jun 6, 2019, at 9:08 AM, Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.7, v5.0.21, v4.19.48, v4.14.123, v4.9.180, v4.4.180.
v5.1.7: Build OK! v5.0.21: Build OK! v4.19.48: Build OK! v4.14.123: Build OK! v4.9.180: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
v4.4.180: Build failed! Errors: net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c:635:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rpc_set_port’; did you mean ‘rpc_net_ns’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
How should we proceed with this patch?
If the review completes without objection, I will resubmit this patch with an updated Cc: . Thanks for testing!
-- Chuck Lever
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org