The datasheet does not document any registers to control drive strength, and no drive strength registers are for this reason described for this SoC. The flags indicating that drive strength can be controlled are however set for some pins in the driver.
This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when the sh-pfc core tries to access the struct describing the drive strength registers, for example when reading the sysfs file pinconf-pins.
Fix this by removing the SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH from all pins
Fixes: b92ac66a1819602b ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add R8A77970 PFC support") Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
--- drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
Hi,
This is a backport of commit 550b6f7e8cf93fc2753aa01e655ed5471012ab5a from Linusw linux-pinctrl.git tree. It's applicable for v4.16 and v4.17.
This is my first backport patch submission for stable, please let me know if I can improve the format of this patch commit message or subject in any way.
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c index b1bb7263532b3bf9..049b374aa4ae4698 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c @@ -22,12 +22,12 @@ #include "sh_pfc.h"
#define CPU_ALL_PORT(fn, sfx) \ - PORT_GP_CFG_22(0, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH), \ - PORT_GP_CFG_28(1, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH), \ - PORT_GP_CFG_17(2, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH), \ - PORT_GP_CFG_17(3, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH), \ - PORT_GP_CFG_6(4, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH), \ - PORT_GP_CFG_15(5, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH) + PORT_GP_22(0, fn, sfx), \ + PORT_GP_28(1, fn, sfx), \ + PORT_GP_17(2, fn, sfx), \ + PORT_GP_17(3, fn, sfx), \ + PORT_GP_6(4, fn, sfx), \ + PORT_GP_15(5, fn, sfx) /* * F_() : just information * FM() : macro for FN_xxx / xxx_MARK
Hi Niklas,
Thanks for your backport!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:24 PM Niklas Söderlund niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se wrote:
commit 550b6f7e8cf93fc2753aa01e655ed5471012ab5a upstream.
The datasheet does not document any registers to control drive strength, and no drive strength registers are for this reason described for this SoC. The flags indicating that drive strength can be controlled are however set for some pins in the driver.
This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when the sh-pfc core tries to access the struct describing the drive strength registers, for example when reading the sysfs file pinconf-pins.
Fix this by removing the SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH from all pins
Fixes: b92ac66a1819602b ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add R8A77970 PFC support") Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be
This is a backport of commit 550b6f7e8cf93fc2753aa01e655ed5471012ab5a from Linusw linux-pinctrl.git tree. It's applicable for v4.16 and v4.17.
Which is now upstream.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:42:05AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Niklas,
Thanks for your backport!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 5:24 PM Niklas Söderlund niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se wrote:
commit 550b6f7e8cf93fc2753aa01e655ed5471012ab5a upstream.
The datasheet does not document any registers to control drive strength, and no drive strength registers are for this reason described for this SoC. The flags indicating that drive strength can be controlled are however set for some pins in the driver.
This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when the sh-pfc core tries to access the struct describing the drive strength registers, for example when reading the sysfs file pinconf-pins.
Fix this by removing the SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH from all pins
Fixes: b92ac66a1819602b ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add R8A77970 PFC support") Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven geert+renesas@glider.be
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms+renesas@verge.net.au
This is a backport of commit 550b6f7e8cf93fc2753aa01e655ed5471012ab5a from Linusw linux-pinctrl.git tree. It's applicable for v4.16 and v4.17.
Which is now upstream.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 05:24:17PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
The datasheet does not document any registers to control drive strength, and no drive strength registers are for this reason described for this SoC. The flags indicating that drive strength can be controlled are however set for some pins in the driver.
This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when the sh-pfc core tries to access the struct describing the drive strength registers, for example when reading the sysfs file pinconf-pins.
Fix this by removing the SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH from all pins
Fixes: b92ac66a1819602b ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add R8A77970 PFC support") Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Hi,
This is a backport of commit 550b6f7e8cf93fc2753aa01e655ed5471012ab5a from Linusw linux-pinctrl.git tree. It's applicable for v4.16 and v4.17.
4.16.y is long end-of-life, nothing I can do there anymore, sorry.
This is my first backport patch submission for stable, please let me know if I can improve the format of this patch commit message or subject in any way.
Works just fine, now queued up for 4.17.y, thanks!
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org