The patch titled Subject: mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap, v3 has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap.patch

This patch should soon appear at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-o... and later at http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-o...

Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------ From: David Rientjes rientjes@google.com Subject: mm, oom: fix concurrent munlock and oom reaper unmap, v3

Since exit_mmap() is done without the protection of mm->mmap_sem, it is possible for the oom reaper to concurrently operate on an mm until MMF_OOM_SKIP is set.

This allows munlock_vma_pages_all() to concurrently run while the oom reaper is operating on a vma. Since munlock_vma_pages_range() depends on clearing VM_LOCKED from vm_flags before actually doing the munlock to determine if any other vmas are locking the same memory, the check for VM_LOCKED in the oom reaper is racy.

This is especially noticeable on architectures such as powerpc where clearing a huge pmd requires serialize_against_pte_lookup(). If the pmd is zapped by the oom reaper during follow_page_mask() after the check for pmd_none() is bypassed, this ends up deferencing a NULL ptl or a kernel oops.

Fix this by manually freeing all possible memory from the mm before doing the munlock and then setting MMF_OOM_SKIP. The oom reaper can not run on the mm anymore so the munlock is safe to do in exit_mmap(). It also matches the logic that the oom reaper currently uses for determining when to set MMF_OOM_SKIP itself, so there's no new risk of excessive oom killing.

This issue fixes CVE-2018-1000200.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1804241526320.238665@chino.kir.corp... Fixes: 212925802454 ("mm: oom: let oom_reap_task and exit_mmap run concurrently") Signed-off-by: David Rientjes rientjes@google.com Suggested-by: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Cc: Andrea Arcangeli aarcange@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [4.14+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---

include/linux/oom.h | 2 + mm/mmap.c | 44 +++++++++++++--------- mm/oom_kill.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/linux/oom.h~mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap include/linux/oom.h --- a/include/linux/oom.h~mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap +++ a/include/linux/oom.h @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ static inline int check_stable_address_s return 0; }

+void __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm); + extern unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask, unsigned long totalpages); diff -puN mm/mmap.c~mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap mm/mmap.c --- a/mm/mmap.c~mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap +++ a/mm/mmap.c @@ -3024,6 +3024,32 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) /* mm's last user has gone, and its about to be pulled down */ mmu_notifier_release(mm);

+ if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) { + /* + * Manually reap the mm to free as much memory as possible. + * Then, as the oom reaper does, set MMF_OOM_SKIP to disregard + * this mm from further consideration. Taking mm->mmap_sem for + * write after setting MMF_OOM_SKIP will guarantee that the oom + * reaper will not run on this mm again after mmap_sem is + * dropped. + * + * Nothing can be holding mm->mmap_sem here and the above call + * to mmu_notifier_release(mm) ensures mmu notifier callbacks in + * __oom_reap_task_mm() will not block. + * + * This needs to be done before calling munlock_vma_pages_all(), + * which clears VM_LOCKED, otherwise the oom reaper cannot + * reliably test it. + */ + mutex_lock(&oom_lock); + __oom_reap_task_mm(mm); + mutex_unlock(&oom_lock); + + set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags); + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem); + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); + } + if (mm->locked_vm) { vma = mm->mmap; while (vma) { @@ -3045,24 +3071,6 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm) /* update_hiwater_rss(mm) here? but nobody should be looking */ /* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */ unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1); - - if (unlikely(mm_is_oom_victim(mm))) { - /* - * Wait for oom_reap_task() to stop working on this - * mm. Because MMF_OOM_SKIP is already set before - * calling down_read(), oom_reap_task() will not run - * on this "mm" post up_write(). - * - * mm_is_oom_victim() cannot be set from under us - * either because victim->mm is already set to NULL - * under task_lock before calling mmput and oom_mm is - * set not NULL by the OOM killer only if victim->mm - * is found not NULL while holding the task_lock. - */ - set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags); - down_write(&mm->mmap_sem); - up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); - } free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING); tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1);

diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap mm/oom_kill.c --- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap +++ a/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -469,7 +469,6 @@ bool process_shares_mm(struct task_struc return false; }

- #ifdef CONFIG_MMU /* * OOM Reaper kernel thread which tries to reap the memory used by the OOM @@ -480,16 +479,54 @@ static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reape static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list; static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock);

-static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm) +void __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) { - struct mmu_gather tlb; struct vm_area_struct *vma; + + /* + * Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content + * is no longer stable. No barriers really needed because unmapping + * should imply barriers already and the reader would hit a page fault + * if it stumbled over a reaped memory. + */ + set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags); + + for (vma = mm->mmap ; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { + if (!can_madv_dontneed_vma(vma)) + continue; + + /* + * Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped + * without additional steps which we cannot afford as we + * are OOM already. + * + * We do not even care about fs backed pages because all + * which are reclaimable have already been reclaimed and + * we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref + * count elevated without a good reason. + */ + if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) { + const unsigned long start = vma->vm_start; + const unsigned long end = vma->vm_end; + struct mmu_gather tlb; + + tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, start, end); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end); + unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, NULL); + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end); + tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, start, end); + } + } +} + +static bool oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm) +{ bool ret = true;

/* * We have to make sure to not race with the victim exit path * and cause premature new oom victim selection: - * __oom_reap_task_mm exit_mm + * oom_reap_task_mm exit_mm * mmget_not_zero * mmput * atomic_dec_and_test @@ -534,39 +571,8 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct ta

trace_start_task_reaping(tsk->pid);

- /* - * Tell all users of get_user/copy_from_user etc... that the content - * is no longer stable. No barriers really needed because unmapping - * should imply barriers already and the reader would hit a page fault - * if it stumbled over a reaped memory. - */ - set_bit(MMF_UNSTABLE, &mm->flags); - - for (vma = mm->mmap ; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) { - if (!can_madv_dontneed_vma(vma)) - continue; + __oom_reap_task_mm(mm);

- /* - * Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped - * without additional steps which we cannot afford as we - * are OOM already. - * - * We do not even care about fs backed pages because all - * which are reclaimable have already been reclaimed and - * we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref - * count elevated without a good reason. - */ - if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) { - const unsigned long start = vma->vm_start; - const unsigned long end = vma->vm_end; - - tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, start, end); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, start, end); - unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, start, end, NULL); - mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, start, end); - tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, start, end); - } - } pr_info("oom_reaper: reaped process %d (%s), now anon-rss:%lukB, file-rss:%lukB, shmem-rss:%lukB\n", task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm, K(get_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES)), @@ -587,14 +593,13 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_st struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->signal->oom_mm;

/* Retry the down_read_trylock(mmap_sem) a few times */ - while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !__oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm)) + while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm)) schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10);

if (attempts <= MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES || test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags)) goto done;

- pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n", task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm); debug_show_all_locks(); _

Patches currently in -mm which might be from rientjes@google.com are

mm-oom-fix-concurrent-munlock-and-oom-reaper-unmap.patch