RE: Patch "riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz" has been added to the 6.10-stable tree
On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0rate to 1.5GHz
to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is: riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi Sasha,
This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@starfivetech.c...
I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you should add the driver patch.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
commit 67b60bf9777bd340c7179adb5376dcdd3f0c260c Author: Xingyu Wu xingyu.wu@starfivetech.com Date: Mon Aug 26 16:04:30 2024 +0800
riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0rate to 1.5GHz
[ Upstream commit 61f2e8a3a94175dbbaad6a54f381b2a505324610 ] CPUfreq supports 4 cpu frequency loads on 375/500/750/1500MHz. But now PLL0 rate is 1GHz and the cpu frequency loads become 250/333/500/1000MHz in fact. The PLL0 rate should be default set to 1.5GHz and set the cpu_core rate to 500MHz in safe. Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling for JH7110 SoC") Signed-off-by: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@starfivetech.com> Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi index 68d16717db8c..51d85f447626 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi @@ -354,6 +354,12 @@ spi_dev0: spi@0 { }; };
+&syscrg {
- assigned-clocks = <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_CPU_CORE>,
<&pllclk JH7110_PLLCLK_PLL0_OUT>;- assigned-clock-rates = <500000000>, <1500000000>; };
&sysgpio { i2c0_pins: i2c0-0 { i2c-pins {
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0rate to 1.5GHz
to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is: riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi Sasha,
This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@starfivetech.c...
I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you should add the driver patch.
Then why does the commit say:
Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling for JH7110 SoC")
Is that line incorrect?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreqby setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz
to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is: riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi Sasha,
This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@starfive tech.com/
I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you should add
the driver patch.
Then why does the commit say:
Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling forJH7110 SoC")
Is that line incorrect?
No, this patch can also fix the problem. In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in both patches.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreqby setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz
to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is: riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi Sasha,
This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@starfive tech.com/
I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you should add
the driver patch.
Then why does the commit say:
Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling forJH7110 SoC")
Is that line incorrect?
No, this patch can also fix the problem. In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate ofCPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz
to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is: riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi Sasha,
This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@star five tech.com/
I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you should add
the driver patch.
Then why does the commit say:
Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scalingfor JH7110 SoC")
Is that line incorrect?
No, this patch can also fix the problem. In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in
both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
On 9/14/24 3:04 AM, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate ofCPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz
to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is: riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it.
Hi Sasha,
This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@star five tech.com/
I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you should add
the driver patch.
Then why does the commit say:
Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scalingfor JH7110 SoC")
Is that line incorrect?
No, this patch can also fix the problem. In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in
both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
I think Greg is looking for this:
commit 538d5477b25289ac5d46ca37b9e5b4d685cbe019
clk: starfive: jh7110-sys: Add notifier for PLL0 clock
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 03:32:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/14/24 3:04 AM, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote: > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch > titled > > riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of > CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz > > to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- > queue.git;a=summary > > The filename of the patch is: > riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch > and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory. > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the > stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it. > Hi Sasha,
This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@star five tech.com/
I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you should add
the driver patch.
Then why does the commit say:
> Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling > for > JH7110 SoC")
Is that line incorrect?
No, this patch can also fix the problem. In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in
both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
I think Greg is looking for this:
commit 538d5477b25289ac5d46ca37b9e5b4d685cbe019
clk: starfive: jh7110-sys: Add notifier for PLL0 clock
That commit is already in the following releases: 6.6.51 6.10.10 so what are we supposed to be doing here?
confused,
greg k-h
On 9/15/24 6:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 03:32:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/14/24 3:04 AM, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote: >> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch >> titled >> >> riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of >> CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz >> >> to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: >> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- >> queue.git;a=summary >> >> The filename of the patch is: >> riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch >> and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory. >> >> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the >> stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it. >> > Hi Sasha, > > This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@star > five > tech.com/ > > I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. > But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you > should add the driver patch.
Then why does the commit say:
>> Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling >> for >> JH7110 SoC") Is that line incorrect?
No, this patch can also fix the problem. In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in
both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
I think Greg is looking for this:
commit 538d5477b25289ac5d46ca37b9e5b4d685cbe019
clk: starfive: jh7110-sys: Add notifier for PLL0 clock
That commit is already in the following releases: 6.6.51 6.10.10 so what are we supposed to be doing here?
confused,
greg k-h
Sorry, I didn't check to see if it was already in releases. So the 6.10 queue is fine as is.
However, these two patches go together, so the 6.6 queue should also have 61f2e8a3a94175dbbaad6a54f381b2a505324610 "riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz" added to it.
Does that make sense?
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/15/24 6:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 03:32:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/14/24 3:04 AM, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > > On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch > > > titled > > > > > > riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of > > > CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz > > > > > > to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- > > > queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch > > > and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory. > > > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the > > > stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it. > > > > > Hi Sasha, > > > > This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. > > [1]: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@star > > five > > tech.com/ > > > > I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. > > But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you > > should add > the driver patch. > > Then why does the commit say: > > > > Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling > > > for > > > JH7110 SoC") > Is that line incorrect? > No, this patch can also fix the problem. In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in
both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
I think Greg is looking for this:
commit 538d5477b25289ac5d46ca37b9e5b4d685cbe019
clk: starfive: jh7110-sys: Add notifier for PLL0 clock
That commit is already in the following releases: 6.6.51 6.10.10 so what are we supposed to be doing here?
confused,
greg k-h
Sorry, I didn't check to see if it was already in releases. So the 6.10 queue is fine as is.
However, these two patches go together, so the 6.6 queue should also have 61f2e8a3a94175dbbaad6a54f381b2a505324610 "riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz" added to it.
Given that the file arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi is not in the 6.6.y kernel tree, are you sure about this? If so, where should it be applied to instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 9/15/24 8:10 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/15/24 6:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 03:32:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/14/24 3:04 AM, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: >>> On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote: >>>> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch >>>> titled >>>> >>>> riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of >>>> CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz >>>> >>>> to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: >>>> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable- >>>> queue.git;a=summary >>>> >>>> The filename of the patch is: >>>> riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.patch >>>> and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory. >>>> >>>> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the >>>> stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know about it. >>>> >>> Hi Sasha, >>> >>> This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver patch[1]. >>> [1]: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xingyu.wu@star >>> five >>> tech.com/ >>> >>> I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. >>> But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to work and you >>> should add >> the driver patch. >> >> Then why does the commit say: >> >>>> Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add cpu scaling >>>> for >>>> JH7110 SoC") >> Is that line incorrect? >> > No, this patch can also fix the problem. > In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I added the Fixes tag in both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
I think Greg is looking for this:
commit 538d5477b25289ac5d46ca37b9e5b4d685cbe019
clk: starfive: jh7110-sys: Add notifier for PLL0 clock
That commit is already in the following releases: 6.6.51 6.10.10 so what are we supposed to be doing here?
confused,
greg k-h
Sorry, I didn't check to see if it was already in releases. So the 6.10 queue is fine as is.
However, these two patches go together, so the 6.6 queue should also have 61f2e8a3a94175dbbaad6a54f381b2a505324610 "riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz" added to it.
Given that the file arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi is not in the 6.6.y kernel tree, are you sure about this? If so, where should it be applied to instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
Doh, the patch was rebased, so it won't apply to 6.6. The good news is that not applying it won't break anything, it just renders the other patch to have no effect (the board still runs at 1 GHz instead of 1.5 GHz).
So in the end, there's nothing to do.
On 9/15/24 23:10 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/15/24 6:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 03:32:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/14/24 3:04 AM, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > > > On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added > > > > the patch titled > > > > > > > > riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower > > > > rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz > > > > > > > > to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: > > > > > > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/s > > > > table- > > > > queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > > > > > > riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.p > > > > atch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 > > > > subdirectory. > > > > > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added > > > > to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know
about it.
> > > > > > > Hi Sasha, > > > > > > This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver
patch[1].
> > > [1]: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xing > > > yu.wu@star > > > five > > > tech.com/ > > > > > > I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. > > > But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to > > > work and you should add > > the driver patch. > > > > Then why does the commit say: > > > > > > Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add > > > > cpu scaling for > > > > JH7110 SoC") > > Is that line incorrect? > > > No, this patch can also fix the problem. > In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I > added the Fixes tag in both patches.
What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here?
This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
I think Greg is looking for this:
commit 538d5477b25289ac5d46ca37b9e5b4d685cbe019
clk: starfive: jh7110-sys: Add notifier for PLL0 clock
That commit is already in the following releases: 6.6.51 6.10.10 so what are we supposed to be doing here?
confused,
greg k-h
Sorry, I didn't check to see if it was already in releases. So the 6.10 queue is fine as is.
However, these two patches go together, so the 6.6 queue should also have 61f2e8a3a94175dbbaad6a54f381b2a505324610 "riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz" added to it.
Given that the file arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi is not in the 6.6.y kernel tree, are you sure about this? If so, where should it be applied to instead?
Hi Greg,
How about this patch[1] which I sent earlier about DTS? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240507065319.274976-3-xingyu.wu@starfivetech.c...
This patch is based on older kernel without the file (jh7110-common.dtsi) and has been tested to work.
Best regards, Xingyu Wu
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 02:54:57AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 9/15/24 23:10 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 08:01:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/15/24 6:22 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 03:32:33AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
On 9/14/24 3:04 AM, Xingyu Wu wrote:
On 14/09/2024 17:37, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 09:24:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > > On 14/09/2024 16:51, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 08:01:44AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote: > > > > On 13/09/2024 22:12, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added > > > > > the patch titled > > > > > > > > > > riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower > > > > > rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz > > > > > > > > > > to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/s > > > > > table- > > > > > queue.git;a=summary > > > > > > > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > > > > > > > > > riscv-dts-starfive-jh7110-common-fix-lower-rate-of-c.p > > > > > atch and it can be found in the queue-6.10 > > > > > subdirectory. > > > > > > > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added > > > > > to the stable tree, please let stable@vger.kernel.org know
about it.
> > > > > > > > > Hi Sasha, > > > > > > > > This patch only has the part of DTS without the clock driver
patch[1].
> > > > [1]: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240826080430.179788-2-xing > > > > yu.wu@star > > > > five > > > > tech.com/ > > > > > > > > I don't know your plan about this driver patch, or maybe I missed it. > > > > But the DTS changes really needs the driver patch to > > > > work and you should add > > > the driver patch. > > > > > > Then why does the commit say: > > > > > > > > Fixes: e2c510d6d630 ("riscv: dts: starfive: Add > > > > > cpu scaling for > > > > > JH7110 SoC") > > > Is that line incorrect? > > > > > No, this patch can also fix the problem. > > In that patchset, the patch 2 depended on patch 1, so I > > added the Fixes tag in > both patches. > > What is the commit id of the other change you are referring to here? > This commit id is the bug I'm trying to fix. The Fixes tag need to add it.
Thanks, Xingyu Wu
I think Greg is looking for this:
commit 538d5477b25289ac5d46ca37b9e5b4d685cbe019
clk: starfive: jh7110-sys: Add notifier for PLL0 clock
That commit is already in the following releases: 6.6.51 6.10.10 so what are we supposed to be doing here?
confused,
greg k-h
Sorry, I didn't check to see if it was already in releases. So the 6.10 queue is fine as is.
However, these two patches go together, so the 6.6 queue should also have 61f2e8a3a94175dbbaad6a54f381b2a505324610 "riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: Fix lower rate of CPUfreq by setting PLL0 rate to 1.5GHz" added to it.
Given that the file arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi is not in the 6.6.y kernel tree, are you sure about this? If so, where should it be applied to instead?
Hi Greg,
How about this patch[1] which I sent earlier about DTS? [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240507065319.274976-3-xingyu.wu@starfivetech.c...
This patch is based on older kernel without the file (jh7110-common.dtsi) and has been tested to work.
If you think it fits the rules of: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html then great, resubmit it!
thanks,
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Greg KH -
Ron Economos -
Xingyu Wu