Move the function nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first() (previously nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first()) to nand_base.c, and export it as a GPL symbol, so that it can be used by more modules.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2 Fixes: a0ac778eb82c ("mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Add support for the JZ4740") Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net --- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c | 70 +---------------------------- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c index 89de24d3bb7a..45fec8c192ab 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c @@ -371,74 +371,6 @@ static int nand_davinci_correct_4bit(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char *data, return corrected; }
-/** - * nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - hw ecc, read oob first - * @chip: nand chip info structure - * @buf: buffer to store read data - * @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi - * @page: page number to read - * - * Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read first. For this - * ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These methods - * read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME support with - * multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and reads/writes ECC from - * the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block markings. - */ -static int nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, - uint8_t *buf, - int oob_required, int page) -{ - struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); - int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret; - int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes; - int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps; - uint8_t *p = buf; - uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf; - unsigned int max_bitflips = 0; - - /* Read the OOB area first */ - ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize); - if (ret) - return ret; - - ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0); - if (ret) - return ret; - - ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0, - chip->ecc.total); - if (ret) - return ret; - - for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) { - int stat; - - chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ); - - ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false); - if (ret) - return ret; - - stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL); - if (stat == -EBADMSG && - (chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) { - /* check for empty pages with bitflips */ - stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize, - &ecc_code[i], - eccbytes, NULL, 0, - chip->ecc.strength); - } - - if (stat < 0) { - mtd->ecc_stats.failed++; - } else { - mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat; - max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat); - } - } - return max_bitflips; -} - /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page flash, storing @@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip) } else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nand_get_large_page_ooblayout()); - chip->ecc.read_page = nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; + chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; } else { return -EIO; } diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, return max_bitflips; }
+/** + * nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read with ECC + * data read from OOB area + * @chip: nand chip info structure + * @buf: buffer to store read data + * @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi + * @page: page number to read + * + * Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read first. For this + * ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These methods + * read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME support with + * multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and reads/writes ECC from + * the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block markings. + */ +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, + int oob_required, int page) +{ + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); + int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret; + int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes; + int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps; + uint8_t *p = buf; + uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf; + unsigned int max_bitflips = 0; + + /* Read the OOB area first */ + ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0, + chip->ecc.total); + if (ret) + return ret; + + for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) { + int stat; + + chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ); + + ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false); + if (ret) + return ret; + + stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL); + if (stat == -EBADMSG && + (chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) { + /* check for empty pages with bitflips */ + stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize, + &ecc_code[i], + eccbytes, NULL, 0, + chip->ecc.strength); + } + + if (stat < 0) { + mtd->ecc_stats.failed++; + } else { + mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat; + max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat); + } + } + return max_bitflips; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first); + /** * nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC syndrome based page read * @chip: nand chip info structure diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit, bool check_only); int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit); +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, + int oob_required, int page);
/* Scan and identify a NAND device */ int nand_scan_with_ids(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int max_chips,
Hi Paul,
paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Sat, 9 Oct 2021 20:49:51 +0200:
Move the function nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first() (previously nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first()) to nand_base.c, and export it as a GPL symbol, so that it can be used by more modules.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2 Fixes: a0ac778eb82c ("mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Add support for the JZ4740") Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c | 70 +---------------------------- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c index 89de24d3bb7a..45fec8c192ab 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c @@ -371,74 +371,6 @@ static int nand_davinci_correct_4bit(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char *data, return corrected; } -/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - hw ecc, read oob first
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read first. For this
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These methods
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block markings.
- */
-static int nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip,
uint8_t *buf,int oob_required, int page)-{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
-}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page flash, storing @@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip) } else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nand_get_large_page_ooblayout());
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; } else { return -EIO; }diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, return max_bitflips; } +/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read with ECC
data read from OOB area
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read first. For this
requires
With this ECC configuration?
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These methods
I do not understand this sentence nor the next one about syndrome. I believe it is related to your engine and should not leak into the core.
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block markings.
That's a sentence I don't like. What do you mean exactly?
What "Infix ECC" scheme is?
Do you mean that unlike the syndrome mode it *does not* overwrite the BBM ?
- */
+int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
int oob_required, int page)+{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
Definitely not, your are requesting the chip to do the read_page operation twice. You only need a nand_change_read_column I believe.
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first);
/**
- nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC syndrome based page read
- @chip: nand chip info structure
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit, bool check_only); int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit); +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
int oob_required, int page);
You certainly want to add this symbol closer to the other read/write page helpers?
/* Scan and identify a NAND device */ int nand_scan_with_ids(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int max_chips,
Thanks, Miquèl
Hi Miquel,
Le ven., oct. 15 2021 at 08:13:13 +0200, Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com a écrit :
Hi Paul,
paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Sat, 9 Oct 2021 20:49:51 +0200:
Move the function nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first() (previously nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first()) to nand_base.c, and export it as a GPL symbol, so that it can be used by more modules.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2 Fixes: a0ac778eb82c ("mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Add support for the JZ4740") Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c | 70 +---------------------------- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c index 89de24d3bb7a..45fec8c192ab 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c @@ -371,74 +371,6 @@ static int nand_davinci_correct_4bit(struct nand_chip *chip, u_char *data, return corrected; }
-/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - hw ecc, read oob first
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read
first. For this
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These
methods
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME
support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and
reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block
markings.
- */
-static int nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip,
uint8_t *buf,int oob_required, int page)-{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi,
mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
-}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page flash, storing @@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip) } else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nand_get_large_page_ooblayout());
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; } else { return -EIO; }diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, return max_bitflips; }
+/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read with ECC
data read from OOB area
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read
first. For this
requires
With this ECC configuration?
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These
methods
I do not understand this sentence nor the next one about syndrome. I believe it is related to your engine and should not leak into the core.
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME
support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and
reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block
markings.
That's a sentence I don't like. What do you mean exactly?
What "Infix ECC" scheme is?
Do you mean that unlike the syndrome mode it *does not* overwrite the BBM ?
I don't mean anything. I did not write that comment. I just moved the function verbatim with no changes. If something needs to be fixed, then it needs to be fixed before/after this patch.
- */
+int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
int oob_required, int page)+{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi,
mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
Definitely not, your are requesting the chip to do the read_page operation twice. You only need a nand_change_read_column I believe.
Again, this code is just being moved around - don't shoot the messenger :)
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first);
/**
- nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC syndrome
based page read
- @chip: nand chip info structure
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit, bool check_only); int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit); +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
int oob_required, int page);You certainly want to add this symbol closer to the other read/write page helpers?
Where would that be? The other read/write page helpers are all "static" so they don't appear in any header.
Cheers, -Paul
/* Scan and identify a NAND device */ int nand_scan_with_ids(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned int max_chips,
Thanks, Miquèl
Hi Paul,
paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:38:31 +0100:
Hi Miquel,
Le ven., oct. 15 2021 at 08:13:13 +0200, Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com a écrit :
Hi Paul,
paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Sat, 9 Oct 2021 20:49:51 +0200:
Move the function nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first() (previously nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first()) to nand_base.c, and >> export it as a GPL symbol, so that it can be used by more modules.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2
Fixes: a0ac778eb82c ("mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Add support for the >> JZ4740") Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c | 70 >> +---------------------------- drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 69 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c
index 89de24d3bb7a..45fec8c192ab 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c @@ -371,74 +371,6 @@ static int nand_davinci_correct_4bit(struct >> nand_chip *chip, u_char *data, return corrected; }
-/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - hw ecc, read oob first
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read >> first. For this
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These >> methods
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME >> support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and >> reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block >> markings.
- */
-static int nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip >> *chip,
uint8_t *buf,int oob_required, int page)-{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, >> mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
-}
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
/* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page flash, storing
@@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct >> nand_chip *chip) } else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nand_get_large_page_ooblayout());
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; } else { return -EIO; }diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc(struct >> nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, return max_bitflips; }
+/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read with ECC
data read from OOB area
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read >> first. For this
requires
With this ECC configuration?
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. These >> methods
I do not understand this sentence nor the next one about syndrome. I believe it is related to your engine and should not leak into the > core.
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the ECC_HW_SYNDROME >> support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and >> reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad block >> markings.
That's a sentence I don't like. What do you mean exactly?
What "Infix ECC" scheme is?
Do you mean that unlike the syndrome mode it *does not* overwrite the BBM ?
I don't mean anything. I did not write that comment. I just moved the function verbatim with no changes. If something needs to be fixed, then it needs to be fixed before/after this patch.
Well, this comment should be adapted because as-is I don't think it's wise to move it around.
- */
+int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page)+{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, >> mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
Definitely not, your are requesting the chip to do the read_page operation twice. You only need a nand_change_read_column I believe.
Again, this code is just being moved around - don't shoot the messenger :)
haha
Well, now you touch the core, so I need to be more careful, and the code is definitely wrong, so even if we don't move that code off, you definitely want to fix it in order to improve your performances.
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code, chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p += eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first);
/**
- nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC syndrome >> based page read
- @chip: nand chip info structure
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h >> b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, >> void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit, bool check_only); int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit); +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page);You certainly want to add this symbol closer to the other read/write page helpers?
Where would that be? The other read/write page helpers are all "static" so they don't appear in any header.
I believe we should keep this header local as long as there are no other users.
Thanks, Miquèl
Le ven., oct. 15 2021 at 10:51:46 +0200, Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com a écrit :
Hi Paul,
paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:38:31 +0100:
Hi Miquel,
Le ven., oct. 15 2021 at 08:13:13 +0200, Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com a écrit :
Hi Paul,
paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Sat, 9 Oct 2021 20:49:51 +0200:
Move the function nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first() (previously nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first()) to nand_base.c, and export it as a GPL symbol, so that it can be used by more modules.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2
Fixes: a0ac778eb82c ("mtd: rawnand: ingenic: Add support for
the >> JZ4740")
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c | 70 >>
+----------------------------
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 69 >>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 2 + 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c >>
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c
index 89de24d3bb7a..45fec8c192ab 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c @@ -371,74 +371,6 @@ static int
nand_davinci_correct_4bit(struct >> nand_chip *chip, u_char *data,
return corrected; }
-/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - hw ecc, read oob first
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to
chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read
first. For this
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW.
These >> methods
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the
ECC_HW_SYNDROME >> support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and >>
reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad
block >> markings.
- */
-static int nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct
nand_chip >> *chip,
uint8_t *buf,int oob_required, int page)-{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, >>
mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code,
chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p +=
eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
-}
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------- */
/* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page flash,
storing
@@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip) } else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nand_get_large_page_ooblayout());
chip->ecc.read_page =nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; } else { return -EIO; }diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c >>
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc(struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, return max_bitflips; }
+/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read
with ECC
data read from OOB area
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to
chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read
first. For this
requires
With this ECC configuration?
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW.
These >> methods
I do not understand this sentence nor the next one about
syndrome. I
believe it is related to your engine and should not leak into the core.
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the
ECC_HW_SYNDROME >> support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and >>
reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad
block >> markings.
That's a sentence I don't like. What do you mean exactly?
What "Infix ECC" scheme is?
Do you mean that unlike the syndrome mode it *does not*
overwrite the
BBM ?
I don't mean anything. I did not write that comment. I just moved the function verbatim with no changes. If something needs to be fixed, then it needs to be fixed before/after this patch.
Well, this comment should be adapted because as-is I don't think it's wise to move it around.
OK.
I think it says that BBM can be overwritten with this configuration, but that would be if the OOB layout covers the BBM area.
- */
+int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip,
uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page)+{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, >>
mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
Definitely not, your are requesting the chip to do the read_page operation twice. You only need a nand_change_read_column I
believe.
Again, this code is just being moved around - don't shoot the messenger :)
haha
Well, now you touch the core, so I need to be more careful, and the code is definitely wrong, so even if we don't move that code off, you definitely want to fix it in order to improve your performances.
I don't see the read_page being done twice?
There's one read_oob, one read_page, then read_data in the loop.
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = mtd_ooblayout_get_eccbytes(mtd, ecc_code,
chip->oob_poi, 0,
chip->ecc.total);- if (ret)
return ret;- for (i = 0; eccsteps; eccsteps--, i += eccbytes, p +=
eccsize) {
int stat;chip->ecc.hwctl(chip, NAND_ECC_READ);ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, p, eccsize, false, false);if (ret)return ret;stat = chip->ecc.correct(chip, p, &ecc_code[i], NULL);if (stat == -EBADMSG &&(chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK)) {/* check for empty pages with bitflips */stat = nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk(p, eccsize,&ecc_code[i],eccbytes, NULL, 0,chip->ecc.strength);}if (stat < 0) {mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;} else {mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);}- }
- return max_bitflips;
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first);
/**
- nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC
syndrome >> based page read
- @chip: nand chip info structure
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h >>
b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct nand_chip
*chip, >> void *buf, unsigned int len,
bool force_8bit, bool check_only);int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit); +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip,
uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page);You certainly want to add this symbol closer to the other
read/write
page helpers?
Where would that be? The other read/write page helpers are all "static" so they don't appear in any header.
I believe we should keep this header local as long as there are no other users.
I'll move it to internal.h then.
Cheers, -Paul
Hi Paul,
*/
> /* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page flash, >> storing
@@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct >> >> nand_chip *chip) } else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nand_get_large_page_ooblayout());
chip->ecc.read_page = >> nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; } else { return -EIO; }diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c >> >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int nand_read_page_hwecc(struct >> >> nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, return max_bitflips; }
> +/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read >> with ECC
data read from OOB area
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to >> chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be read >> >> first. For this
requires
With this ECC configuration?
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. >> These >> methods
I do not understand this sentence nor the next one about >> syndrome. I believe it is related to your engine and should not leak into the >> > core.
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the >> ECC_HW_SYNDROME >> support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and >> >> reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad >> block >> markings.
That's a sentence I don't like. What do you mean exactly?
What "Infix ECC" scheme is?
Do you mean that unlike the syndrome mode it *does not* >> overwrite the BBM ?
I don't mean anything. I did not write that comment. I just moved >> the function verbatim with no changes. If something needs to be >> fixed, then it needs to be fixed before/after this patch.
Well, this comment should be adapted because as-is I don't think it's wise to move it around.
OK.
I think it says that BBM can be overwritten with this configuration, but that would be if the OOB layout covers the BBM area.
If the ooblayout prevents the BBM to be smatched I'm fine and this sentence should disappear because it's misleading.
> + */
+int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, >> uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page)+{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, >> >> mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
Definitely not, your are requesting the chip to do the read_page operation twice. You only need a nand_change_read_column I >> believe.
Again, this code is just being moved around - don't shoot the >> messenger :)
haha
Well, now you touch the core, so I need to be more careful, and the code is definitely wrong, so even if we don't move that code off, you definitely want to fix it in order to improve your performances.
I don't see the read_page being done twice?
There's one read_oob, one read_page, then read_data in the loop.
read_oob and read_page both end up sending READ0 and READSTART so they do request the chip to perform an internal read twice. You need this only once. The call to nand_read_page_op() should be a nand_change_read_column() with no data requested.
/**
- nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC >> syndrome >> based page read
- @chip: nand chip info structure
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h >> >> b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct nand_chip >> *chip, >> void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit, bool check_only); int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void *buf, unsigned int len, bool force_8bit); +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, >> uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page);You certainly want to add this symbol closer to the other >> read/write page helpers?
Where would that be? The other read/write page helpers are all >> "static" so they don't appear in any header.
I believe we should keep this header local as long as there are no other users.
I'll move it to internal.h then.
Why do you want to put it there is there is only one user?
Thanks, Miquèl
Hi,
Le ven., oct. 15 2021 at 11:35:15 +0200, Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com a écrit :
Hi Paul,
*/
>> /* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page
flash, >> storing
@@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int
davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct >> >> nand_chip *chip)
} else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, nand_get_large_page_ooblayout());
chip->ecc.read_page = >>nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first;
chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; } else { return -EIO; }diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c >> >>
b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int
nand_read_page_hwecc(struct >> >> nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
return max_bitflips; } >> +/**
- nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read
with ECC
data read from OOB area
- @chip: nand chip info structure
- @buf: buffer to store read data
- @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to >>
chip->oob_poi
- @page: page number to read
- Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be
read >> >> first. For this
requires
With this ECC configuration?
- ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW.
These >> methods
I do not understand this sentence nor the next one about >>
syndrome. I
believe it is related to your engine and should not leak into
the >> > core.
- read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the >>
ECC_HW_SYNDROME >> support with
- multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and
reads/writes ECC from
- the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad
block >> markings.
That's a sentence I don't like. What do you mean exactly?
What "Infix ECC" scheme is?
Do you mean that unlike the syndrome mode it *does not* >>
overwrite the
BBM ?
I don't mean anything. I did not write that comment. I just
moved >> the function verbatim with no changes. If something needs to be >> fixed, then it needs to be fixed before/after this patch.
Well, this comment should be adapted because as-is I don't think
it's
wise to move it around.
OK.
I think it says that BBM can be overwritten with this configuration, but that would be if the OOB layout covers the BBM area.
If the ooblayout prevents the BBM to be smatched I'm fine and this sentence should disappear because it's misleading.
>> + */ +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip,
uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page)+{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
- int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret;
- int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
- int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps;
- uint8_t *p = buf;
- uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf;
- unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
- /* Read the OOB area first */
- ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, >>
mtd->oobsize);
- if (ret)
return ret;- ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
Definitely not, your are requesting the chip to do the
read_page
operation twice. You only need a nand_change_read_column I >>
believe.
Again, this code is just being moved around - don't shoot
the >> messenger :)
haha
Well, now you touch the core, so I need to be more careful, and
the
code is definitely wrong, so even if we don't move that code off,
you
definitely want to fix it in order to improve your performances.
I don't see the read_page being done twice?
There's one read_oob, one read_page, then read_data in the loop.
read_oob and read_page both end up sending READ0 and READSTART so they do request the chip to perform an internal read twice. You need this only once. The call to nand_read_page_op() should be a nand_change_read_column() with no data requested.
OK.
/**
- nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC >>
syndrome >> based page read
- @chip: nand chip info structure
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h >> >>
b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct
nand_chip >> *chip, >> void *buf, unsigned int len,
bool force_8bit, bool check_only);int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void
*buf,
unsigned int len, bool force_8bit);+int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip,
uint8_t >> *buf,
int oob_required, int page);You certainly want to add this symbol closer to the other >>
read/write
page helpers?
Where would that be? The other read/write page helpers are
all >> "static" so they don't appear in any header.
I believe we should keep this header local as long as there are no other users.
I'll move it to internal.h then.
Why do you want to put it there is there is only one user?
But there are two users: davinci_nand.c and (with patch [3/3]) ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c.
-Paul
Hi Paul,
paul@crapouillou.net wrote on Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:38:00 +0100:
Hi,
Le ven., oct. 15 2021 at 11:35:15 +0200, Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal@bootlin.com a écrit :
Hi Paul,
*/
> >> /* An ECC layout for using 4-bit ECC with small-page >> flash, >> storing > @@ -648,7 +580,7 @@ static int >> davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct >> >> nand_chip *chip) > } else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) { > mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, > nand_get_large_page_ooblayout()); > - chip->ecc.read_page = >> >> nand_davinci_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; > + chip->ecc.read_page = nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first; > } else { > return -EIO; > } > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c >> >> >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > index 3d6c6e880520..cb5f343b9fa2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > @@ -3160,6 +3160,75 @@ static int >> nand_read_page_hwecc(struct >> >> nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, > return max_bitflips; > } > >> +/** > + * nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first - Hardware ECC page read >> >> with ECC > + * data read from OOB area > + * @chip: nand chip info structure > + * @buf: buffer to store read data > + * @oob_required: caller requires OOB data read to >> >> chip->oob_poi > + * @page: page number to read > + * > + * Hardware ECC for large page chips, require OOB to be >> read >> >> first. For this
requires
With this ECC configuration? > + * ECC mode, the write_page method is re-used from ECC_HW. >> >> These >> methods
I do not understand this sentence nor the next one about >> >> syndrome. I believe it is related to your engine and should not leak into >> the >> > core. > + * read/write ECC from the OOB area, unlike the >> >> ECC_HW_SYNDROME >> support with > + * multiple ECC steps, follows the "infix ECC" scheme and >> >> >> reads/writes ECC from > + * the data area, by overwriting the NAND manufacturer bad >> >> block >> markings.
That's a sentence I don't like. What do you mean exactly?
What "Infix ECC" scheme is?
Do you mean that unlike the syndrome mode it *does not* >> >> overwrite the BBM ? > I don't mean anything. I did not write that comment. I just >> moved >> the function verbatim with no changes. If something needs >> to be >> fixed, then it needs to be fixed before/after this patch.
Well, this comment should be adapted because as-is I don't think >> it's wise to move it around.
OK. I think it says that BBM can be overwritten with this >> configuration, but that would be if the OOB layout covers the BBM >> area.
If the ooblayout prevents the BBM to be smatched I'm fine and this sentence should disappear because it's misleading.
> >> + */ > +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, >> >> uint8_t >> *buf, > + int oob_required, int page) > +{ > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip); > + int i, eccsize = chip->ecc.size, ret; > + int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes; > + int eccsteps = chip->ecc.steps; > + uint8_t *p = buf; > + uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->ecc.code_buf; > + unsigned int max_bitflips = 0; > + > + /* Read the OOB area first */ > + ret = nand_read_oob_op(chip, page, 0, chip->oob_poi, >> >> >> mtd->oobsize); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = nand_read_page_op(chip, page, 0, NULL, 0);
Definitely not, your are requesting the chip to do the >> read_page operation twice. You only need a nand_change_read_column I >> >> believe. > Again, this code is just being moved around - don't shoot >> the >> messenger :)
haha
Well, now you touch the core, so I need to be more careful, and >> the code is definitely wrong, so even if we don't move that code off, >> you definitely want to fix it in order to improve your performances.
I don't see the read_page being done twice? There's one read_oob, one read_page, then read_data in the loop.
read_oob and read_page both end up sending READ0 and READSTART so they do request the chip to perform an internal read twice. You need this only once. The call to nand_read_page_op() should be a nand_change_read_column() with no data requested.
OK.
> /** > * nand_read_page_syndrome - [REPLACEABLE] hardware ECC >> >> syndrome >> based page read > * @chip: nand chip info structure > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h >> >> >> b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > index b2f9dd3cbd69..5b88cd51fadb 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > @@ -1539,6 +1539,8 @@ int nand_read_data_op(struct >> nand_chip >> *chip, >> void *buf, unsigned int len, > bool force_8bit, bool check_only); > int nand_write_data_op(struct nand_chip *chip, const void >> *buf, > unsigned int len, bool force_8bit); > +int nand_read_page_hwecc_oob_first(struct nand_chip *chip, >> >> uint8_t >> *buf, > + int oob_required, int page);
You certainly want to add this symbol closer to the other >> >> read/write page helpers? > Where would that be? The other read/write page helpers are >> all >> "static" so they don't appear in any header.
I believe we should keep this header local as long as there are no other users.
I'll move it to internal.h then.
Why do you want to put it there is there is only one user?
But there are two users: davinci_nand.c and (with patch [3/3]) ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c.
Oh right I missed that :)
Then please add two preparation patches which: - fixes the comment (please reword it completely) - avoid the double reading
And keep the location where you moved it (including the header) as-is.
Thanks, Miquèl
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Miquel Raynal -
Paul Cercueil