From: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org

[ Upstream commit 6098475d4cb48d821bdf453c61118c56e26294f0 ]

Currently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new devices so that we can check that we're not trying to reuse a chip select that's already controlled. This means that if the SPI device is itself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI devices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate those devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller and hence already holding the global spi_add_lock. Since we only care about concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per controller, avoiding the deadlock.

This can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.

Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hardik Gohil hgohil@mvista.com --- This fix was not backported to v5.4 and v5.10

please also apply following fix on top of this

spi: fix use-after-free of the add_lock mutex commit 6c53b45c71b4920b5e62f0ea8079a1da382b9434 upstream.

Commit 6098475d4cb4 ("spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses") introduced a per-controller mutex. But mutex_unlock() of said lock is called after the controller is already freed:

drivers/spi/spi.c | 15 +++++---------- include/linux/spi/spi.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c index 0f9410e..58f1947 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c @@ -472,12 +472,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(spi_controller_list); */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(board_lock);

-/* - * Prevents addition of devices with same chip select and - * addition of devices below an unregistering controller. - */ -static DEFINE_MUTEX(spi_add_lock); - /** * spi_alloc_device - Allocate a new SPI device * @ctlr: Controller to which device is connected @@ -580,7 +574,7 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi) * chipselect **BEFORE** we call setup(), else we'll trash * its configuration. Lock against concurrent add() calls. */ - mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock); + mutex_lock(&ctlr->add_lock);

status = bus_for_each_dev(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi, spi_dev_check); if (status) { @@ -624,7 +618,7 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi) }

done: - mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock); + mutex_unlock(&ctlr->add_lock); return status; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_add_device); @@ -2512,6 +2506,7 @@ int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr) spin_lock_init(&ctlr->bus_lock_spinlock); mutex_init(&ctlr->bus_lock_mutex); mutex_init(&ctlr->io_mutex); + mutex_init(&ctlr->add_lock); ctlr->bus_lock_flag = 0; init_completion(&ctlr->xfer_completion); if (!ctlr->max_dma_len) @@ -2657,7 +2652,7 @@ void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)

/* Prevent addition of new devices, unregister existing ones */ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_DYNAMIC)) - mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock); + mutex_lock(&ctlr->add_lock);

device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister);

@@ -2688,7 +2683,7 @@ void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr) mutex_unlock(&board_lock);

if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_DYNAMIC)) - mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock); + mutex_unlock(&ctlr->add_lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_unregister_controller);

diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h index ca39b33..1b9cb90 100644 --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h @@ -483,6 +483,9 @@ struct spi_controller { /* I/O mutex */ struct mutex io_mutex;

+ /* Used to avoid adding the same CS twice */ + struct mutex add_lock; + /* lock and mutex for SPI bus locking */ spinlock_t bus_lock_spinlock; struct mutex bus_lock_mutex;