The QSPI peripheral control and status registers are accessible via the SoC's APB bus, whereas MMIO transactions' data travels on the AHB bus.
Microchip documentation and even sample code from Atmel emphasises the need for a memory barrier before the first MMIO transaction to the AHB-connected QSPI, and before the last write to its registers via APB. This is achieved by the following lines in `atmel_qspi_transfer()`:
/* Dummy read of QSPI_IFR to synchronize APB and AHB accesses */ (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR);
However, the current documentation makes no mention to synchronization requirements in the other direction, i.e. after the last data written via AHB, and before the first register access on APB.
In our case, we were facing an issue where the QSPI peripheral would cease to send any new CSR (nCS Rise) interrupts, leading to a timeout in `atmel_qspi_wait_for_completion()` and ultimately this panic in higher levels:
ubi0 error: ubi_io_write: error -110 while writing 63108 bytes to PEB 491:128, written 63104 bytes
After months of extensive research of the codebase, fiddling around the debugger with kgdb, and back-and-forth with Microchip, we came to the conclusion that the issue is probably that the peripheral is still busy receiving on AHB when the LASTXFER bit is written to its Control Register on APB, therefore this write gets lost, and the peripheral still thinks there is more data to come in the MMIO transfer. This was first formulated when we noticed that doubling the write() of QSPI_CR_LASTXFER seemed to solve the problem.
Ultimately, the solution is to introduce memory barriers after the AHB-mapped MMIO transfers, to ensure ordering.
Fixes: d5433def3153 ("mtd: spi-nor: atmel-quadspi: Add spi-mem support to atmel-quadspi") Cc: Hari.PrasathGE@microchip.com Cc: Mahesh.Abotula@microchip.com Cc: Marco.Cardellini@microchip.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # c0a0203cf579: ("spi: atmel-quadspi: Create `atmel_qspi_ops`"...) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.x.y Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás csokas.bence@prolan.hu ---
Notes: Changes in v2: * dropping --- from commit msg
drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c index 73cf0c3f1477..96fc1c56a221 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c @@ -625,13 +625,20 @@ static int atmel_qspi_transfer(struct spi_mem *mem, (void)atmel_qspi_read(aq, QSPI_IFR);
/* Send/Receive data */ - if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) { memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, aq->mem + offset, op->data.nbytes); - else + + /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + rmb(); + } else { memcpy_toio(aq->mem + offset, op->data.buf.out, op->data.nbytes);
+ /* Synchronize AHB and APB accesses again */ + wmb(); + } + /* Release the chip-select */ atmel_qspi_write(QSPI_CR_LASTXFER, aq, QSPI_CR);
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:12:58 +0100, Bence Csókás wrote:
The QSPI peripheral control and status registers are accessible via the SoC's APB bus, whereas MMIO transactions' data travels on the AHB bus.
Microchip documentation and even sample code from Atmel emphasises the need for a memory barrier before the first MMIO transaction to the AHB-connected QSPI, and before the last write to its registers via APB. This is achieved by the following lines in `atmel_qspi_transfer()`:
[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: atmel-qspi: Memory barriers after memory-mapped I/O commit: be92ab2de0ee1a13291c3b47b2d7eb24d80c0a2c
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks, Mark
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org