On 7/29/24 15:43, Vincenzo Mezzela wrote:

From: Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com

commit ce04abc3fcc62cd5640af981ebfd7c4dc3bded28 upstream.

When userspace sets basic rates, it might send us some rates list that's empty or consists of invalid values only. We're currently ignoring invalid values and then may end up with a rates bitmap that's empty, which later results in a warning.

Reject the call if there were no valid rates.

[ Conflict resolution involved adjusting the patch to accommodate changes in the function signature of ieee80211_parse_bitrates and ieee80211_check_rate_mask ]

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg johannes.berg@intel.com Reported-by: syzbot+07bee335584b04e7c2f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+07bee335584b04e7c2f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=07bee335584b04e7c2f8 Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Mezzela vincenzo.mezzela@gmail.com

---

Hi, please note that a backport of the same patch for v5.15 is available at [1].

Thanks, Vincenzo

• [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240727125033.1774143-1-vincenzo.mezzela@gmail.... net/mac80211/cfg.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/cfg.c b/net/mac80211/cfg.c index 2c60fc165801..d121a3b460f4 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/cfg.c +++ b/net/mac80211/cfg.c @@ -2577,6 +2577,17 @@ static int ieee80211_change_bss(struct wiphy *wiphy, if (!sband) return -EINVAL;

• if (params->basic_rates) {

• if (!ieee80211_parse_bitrates(sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width,
  

• 			      wiphy->bands[sband->band],
  

• 			      params->basic_rates,
  

• 			      params->basic_rates_len,
  

• 			      &sdata->vif.bss_conf.basic_rates))
  

• 	return -EINVAL;
  

• changed |= BSS_CHANGED_BASIC_RATES;
  

• ieee80211_check_rate_mask(&sdata->deflink);
  

• }
• if (params->use_cts_prot >= 0) { sdata->vif.bss_conf.use_cts_prot = params->use_cts_prot; changed |= BSS_CHANGED_ERP_CTS_PROT;

@@ -2600,16 +2611,6 @@ static int ieee80211_change_bss(struct wiphy *wiphy, changed |= BSS_CHANGED_ERP_SLOT; }

• if (params->basic_rates) {

• ieee80211_parse_bitrates(sdata->vif.bss_conf.chandef.width,
  

• 			 wiphy->bands[sband->band],
  

• 			 params->basic_rates,
  

• 			 params->basic_rates_len,
  

• 			 &sdata->vif.bss_conf.basic_rates);
  

• changed |= BSS_CHANGED_BASIC_RATES;
  

• ieee80211_check_rate_mask(&sdata->deflink);
  

• }
• if (params->ap_isolate >= 0) { if (params->ap_isolate) sdata->flags |= IEEE80211_SDATA_DONT_BRIDGE_PACKETS;

Hi, this is a backport for v6.1, I forgot to add the TAG in the subject of the email. Should I resend a new patch with the correct version TAG?

Thanks, Vincenzo