Currently, when a lock class is allocated, nr_unused_locks will be increased by 1, until it gets used: nr_unused_locks will be decreased by 1 in mark_lock(). However, one scenario is missed: a lock class may be zapped without even being used once. This could result into a situation that nr_unused_locks != 0 but no unused lock class is active in the system, and when `cat /proc/lockdep_stats`, a WARN_ON() will be triggered in a CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y kernel:
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused) [...] WARNING: CPU: 41 PID: 1121 at kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:283 lockdep_stats_show+0xba9/0xbd0
And as a result, lockdep will be disabled after this.
Therefore, nr_unused_locks needs to be accounted correctly at zap_class() time.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signee-off-by: Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b15757e63626..686546d52337 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6264,6 +6264,9 @@ static void zap_class(struct pending_free *pf, struct lock_class *class) hlist_del_rcu(&class->hash_entry); WRITE_ONCE(class->key, NULL); WRITE_ONCE(class->name, NULL); + /* class allocated but not used, -1 in nr_unused_locks */ + if (class->usage_mask == 0) + debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks); nr_lock_classes--; __clear_bit(class - lock_classes, lock_classes_in_use); if (class - lock_classes == max_lock_class_idx)
On 3/26/25 2:08 PM, Boqun Feng wrote:
Currently, when a lock class is allocated, nr_unused_locks will be increased by 1, until it gets used: nr_unused_locks will be decreased by 1 in mark_lock(). However, one scenario is missed: a lock class may be zapped without even being used once. This could result into a situation that nr_unused_locks != 0 but no unused lock class is active in the system, and when `cat /proc/lockdep_stats`, a WARN_ON() will be triggered in a CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y kernel:
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused) [...] WARNING: CPU: 41 PID: 1121 at kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:283 lockdep_stats_show+0xba9/0xbd0
And as a result, lockdep will be disabled after this.
Therefore, nr_unused_locks needs to be accounted correctly at zap_class() time.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signee-off-by: Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com
Typo: "Signee-off-by"?
Other than that, LGTM
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b15757e63626..686546d52337 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6264,6 +6264,9 @@ static void zap_class(struct pending_free *pf, struct lock_class *class) hlist_del_rcu(&class->hash_entry); WRITE_ONCE(class->key, NULL); WRITE_ONCE(class->name, NULL);
/* class allocated but not used, -1 in nr_unused_locks */
if (class->usage_mask == 0)
nr_lock_classes--; __clear_bit(class - lock_classes, lock_classes_in_use); if (class - lock_classes == max_lock_class_idx)debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 02:26:53PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
On 3/26/25 2:08 PM, Boqun Feng wrote:
Currently, when a lock class is allocated, nr_unused_locks will be increased by 1, until it gets used: nr_unused_locks will be decreased by 1 in mark_lock(). However, one scenario is missed: a lock class may be zapped without even being used once. This could result into a situation that nr_unused_locks != 0 but no unused lock class is active in the system, and when `cat /proc/lockdep_stats`, a WARN_ON() will be triggered in a CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y kernel:
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused) [...] WARNING: CPU: 41 PID: 1121 at kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:283 lockdep_stats_show+0xba9/0xbd0
And as a result, lockdep will be disabled after this.
Therefore, nr_unused_locks needs to be accounted correctly at zap_class() time.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signee-off-by: Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com
Typo: "Signee-off-by"?
Oops, yeah.
Other than that, LGTM
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com
Thanks!
Regards, Boqun
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b15757e63626..686546d52337 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6264,6 +6264,9 @@ static void zap_class(struct pending_free *pf, struct lock_class *class) hlist_del_rcu(&class->hash_entry); WRITE_ONCE(class->key, NULL); WRITE_ONCE(class->name, NULL);
/* class allocated but not used, -1 in nr_unused_locks */
if (class->usage_mask == 0)
nr_lock_classes--; __clear_bit(class - lock_classes, lock_classes_in_use); if (class - lock_classes == max_lock_class_idx)debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
* Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b15757e63626..686546d52337 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6264,6 +6264,9 @@ static void zap_class(struct pending_free *pf, struct lock_class *class) hlist_del_rcu(&class->hash_entry); WRITE_ONCE(class->key, NULL); WRITE_ONCE(class->name, NULL);
/* class allocated but not used, -1 in nr_unused_locks */
if (class->usage_mask == 0)
debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
Nit: capitalization in comments should follow the style of the surrounding code - ie. I did the change below.
Thanks,
Ingo
======================> kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 686546d52337..58d78a33ac65 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6264,7 +6264,7 @@ static void zap_class(struct pending_free *pf, struct lock_class *class) hlist_del_rcu(&class->hash_entry); WRITE_ONCE(class->key, NULL); WRITE_ONCE(class->name, NULL); - /* class allocated but not used, -1 in nr_unused_locks */ + /* Class allocated but not used, -1 in nr_unused_locks */ if (class->usage_mask == 0) debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks); nr_lock_classes--;
The following commit has been merged into the locking/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 495f53d5cca0f939eaed9dca90b67e7e6fb0e30c Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/495f53d5cca0f939eaed9dca90b67e7e6fb0e30c Author: Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com AuthorDate: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:08:30 -07:00 Committer: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org CommitterDate: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:23:17 +01:00
locking/lockdep: Decrease nr_unused_locks if lock unused in zap_class()
Currently, when a lock class is allocated, nr_unused_locks will be increased by 1, until it gets used: nr_unused_locks will be decreased by 1 in mark_lock(). However, one scenario is missed: a lock class may be zapped without even being used once. This could result into a situation that nr_unused_locks != 0 but no unused lock class is active in the system, and when `cat /proc/lockdep_stats`, a WARN_ON() will be triggered in a CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP=y kernel:
[...] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused) [...] WARNING: CPU: 41 PID: 1121 at kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:283 lockdep_stats_show+0xba9/0xbd0
And as a result, lockdep will be disabled after this.
Therefore, nr_unused_locks needs to be accounted correctly at zap_class() time.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250326180831.510348-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index b15757e..58d78a3 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -6264,6 +6264,9 @@ static void zap_class(struct pending_free *pf, struct lock_class *class) hlist_del_rcu(&class->hash_entry); WRITE_ONCE(class->key, NULL); WRITE_ONCE(class->name, NULL); + /* Class allocated but not used, -1 in nr_unused_locks */ + if (class->usage_mask == 0) + debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks); nr_lock_classes--; __clear_bit(class - lock_classes, lock_classes_in_use); if (class - lock_classes == max_lock_class_idx)
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org