While we do handle the additional cursor sizes introduced in NVE4, it looks like we accidentally broke this when converting over to use Nvidia's display headers. Since we now use NVVAL in dispnv50/head907d.c in order to format the value for the cursor layout and NVD9 only had one byte reserved vs. the 2 bytes reserved in later generations, we end up accidentally stripping the second bit in the cursor layout format parameter - causing us to set the wrong cursor size.

This fixes that by adding our own curs_set hook for 917d which uses the NV917D headers.

Cc: Martin Peres martin.peres@free.fr Cc: Jeremy Cline jcline@redhat.com Cc: Simon Ser contact@emersion.fr Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9+ Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Fixes: ed0b86a90bf9 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core head_curs_set()") --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/head917d.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++- .../drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl917d.h | 4 +++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/head917d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/head917d.c index a5d827403660..ea9f8667305e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/head917d.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/head917d.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include "head.h" #include "core.h"

+#include "nvif/push.h" #include <nvif/push507c.h>

#include <nvhw/class/cl917d.h> @@ -73,6 +74,31 @@ head917d_base(struct nv50_head *head, struct nv50_head_atom *asyh) return 0; }

+static int +head917d_curs_set(struct nv50_head *head, struct nv50_head_atom *asyh) +{ + struct nvif_push *push = nv50_disp(head->base.base.dev)->core->chan.push; + const int i = head->base.index; + int ret; + + ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 5); + if (ret) + return ret; + + PUSH_MTHD(push, NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR(i), + NVDEF(NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR, ENABLE, ENABLE) | + NVVAL(NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR, FORMAT, asyh->curs.format) | + NVVAL(NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR, SIZE, asyh->curs.layout) | + NVVAL(NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR, HOT_SPOT_X, 0) | + NVVAL(NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR, HOT_SPOT_Y, 0) | + NVDEF(NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR, COMPOSITION, ALPHA_BLEND), + + HEAD_SET_OFFSET_CURSOR(i), asyh->curs.offset >> 8); + + PUSH_MTHD(push, NV917D, HEAD_SET_CONTEXT_DMA_CURSOR(i), asyh->curs.handle); + return 0; +} + int head917d_curs_layout(struct nv50_head *head, struct nv50_wndw_atom *asyw, struct nv50_head_atom *asyh) @@ -101,7 +127,7 @@ head917d = { .core_clr = head907d_core_clr, .curs_layout = head917d_curs_layout, .curs_format = head507d_curs_format, - .curs_set = head907d_curs_set, + .curs_set = head917d_curs_set, .curs_clr = head907d_curs_clr, .base = head917d_base, .ovly = head907d_ovly, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl917d.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl917d.h index 2a2612d6e1e0..fb223723a38a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl917d.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl917d.h @@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ #define NV917D_HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR_COMPOSITION_ALPHA_BLEND (0x00000000) #define NV917D_HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR_COMPOSITION_PREMULT_ALPHA_BLEND (0x00000001) #define NV917D_HEAD_SET_CONTROL_CURSOR_COMPOSITION_XOR (0x00000002) +#define NV917D_HEAD_SET_OFFSET_CURSOR(a) (0x00000484 + (a)*0x00000300) +#define NV917D_HEAD_SET_OFFSET_CURSOR_ORIGIN 31:0 +#define NV917D_HEAD_SET_CONTEXT_DMA_CURSOR(a) (0x0000048C + (a)*0x00000300) +#define NV917D_HEAD_SET_CONTEXT_DMA_CURSOR_HANDLE 31:0 #define NV917D_HEAD_SET_DITHER_CONTROL(a) (0x000004A0 + (a)*0x00000300) #define NV917D_HEAD_SET_DITHER_CONTROL_ENABLE 0:0 #define NV917D_HEAD_SET_DITHER_CONTROL_ENABLE_DISABLE (0x00000000)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 08:54:12PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:

Nvidia hardware doesn't actually support using tiling formats with the cursor plane, only linear is allowed. In the future, we should write a testcase for this.

There are a couple of old modifier/format sanity tests here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/46876/

Couple of things missing that now came to my mind: - test setplane/etc. rejects unsupported formats/modifiers even if addfb allowed them, exactly for the case where only a subset of planes support something - validate the IN_FORMATS blob harder, eg. make sure each modifier listed there supports at least one format. IIRC this was busted on a few drivers last year, dunno if they got fixed or not. Hmm, actually since this is now using the pre-parsed stuff I guess we should just stick an assert into igt_fill_plane_format_mod() where the blob gets parsed

Fixes: c586f30bf74c ("drm/nouveau/kms: Add format mod prop to base/ovly/nvdisp") Cc: James Jones jajones@nvidia.com Cc: Martin Peres martin.peres@free.fr Cc: Jeremy Cline jcline@redhat.com Cc: Simon Ser contact@emersion.fr Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.8+ Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com

---

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c index ce451242f79e..271de3a63f21 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c @@ -702,6 +702,11 @@ nv50_wndw_init(struct nv50_wndw *wndw) nvif_notify_get(&wndw->notify); } +static const u64 nv50_cursor_format_modifiers[] = {

• DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR,
• DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID,

+};

int nv50_wndw_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct drm_device *dev, enum drm_plane_type type, const char *name, int index, @@ -713,6 +718,7 @@ nv50_wndw_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct drm_device *dev, struct nvif_mmu *mmu = &drm->client.mmu; struct nv50_disp *disp = nv50_disp(dev); struct nv50_wndw *wndw;

• const u64 *format_modifiers; int nformat; int ret;

@@ -728,10 +734,13 @@ nv50_wndw_new_(const struct nv50_wndw_func *func, struct drm_device *dev, for (nformat = 0; format[nformat]; nformat++);

• ret = drm_universal_plane_init(dev, &wndw->plane, heads, &nv50_wndw,

• 		       format, nformat,
  

• 		       nouveau_display(dev)->format_modifiers,
  

• 		       type, "%s-%d", name, index);
  

• if (type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR)

• format_modifiers = nv50_cursor_format_modifiers;
  

• else

• format_modifiers = nouveau_display(dev)->format_modifiers;
  

• ret = drm_universal_plane_init(dev, &wndw->plane, heads, &nv50_wndw, format, nformat,

• 		       format_modifiers, type, "%s-%d", name, index);
  

  if (ret) { kfree(*pwndw); *pwndw = NULL;

-- 2.29.2

---

dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel