From: yangge yangge1116@126.com
If a large number of CMA memory are configured in system (for example, the CMA memory accounts for 50% of the system memory), starting a SEV virtual machine will fail. During starting the SEV virtual machine, it will call pin_user_pages_fast(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin memory. Normally if a page is present and in CMA area, pin_user_pages_fast() will first call __get_user_pages_locked() to pin the page in CMA area, and then call check_and_migrate_movable_pages() to migrate the page from CMA area to non-CMA area. But the current code calling __get_user_pages_locked() will fail, because it call try_grab_folio() to pin page in gup slow path.
The commit 57edfcfd3419 ("mm/gup: accelerate thp gup even for "pages != NULL"") uses try_grab_folio() in gup slow path, which seems to be problematic because try_grap_folio() will check if the page can be longterm pinned. This check may fail and cause __get_user_pages_lock() to fail. However, these checks are not required in gup slow path, seems we can use try_grab_page() instead of try_grab_folio(). In addition, in the current code, try_grab_page() can only add 1 to the page's refcount. We extend this function so that the page's refcount can be increased according to the parameters passed in.
The following log reveals it:
[ 464.325306] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 6734 at mm/gup.c:1313 __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325464] CPU: 13 PID: 6734 Comm: qemu-kvm Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.6.33+ #6 [ 464.325477] RIP: 0010:__get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325515] Call Trace: [ 464.325520] <TASK> [ 464.325523] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325528] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 [ 464.325536] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325541] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 [ 464.325549] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ 464.325554] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 464.325558] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 464.325567] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325575] __gup_longterm_locked+0x212/0x7a0 [ 464.325583] internal_get_user_pages_fast+0xfb/0x190 [ 464.325590] pin_user_pages_fast+0x47/0x60 [ 464.325598] sev_pin_memory+0xca/0x170 [kvm_amd] [ 464.325616] sev_mem_enc_register_region+0x81/0x130 [kvm_amd]
In another thread [1], hugepd also has a similar problem, so include relevant handling codes.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240604234858.948986-2-yang@os.amperecomputing....
Fixes: 57edfcfd3419 ("mm/gup: accelerate thp gup even for "pages != NULL"") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: yangge yangge1116@126.com --- mm/gup.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +- mm/internal.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
V2: 1, Using unlikely instead of WARN_ON_ONCE 2, Reworked the code and commit log to include hugepd path handling from Yang
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c index 6ff9f95..070cf58 100644 --- a/mm/gup.c +++ b/mm/gup.c @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void gup_put_folio(struct folio *folio, int refs, unsigned int flags) * -ENOMEM FOLL_GET or FOLL_PIN was set, but the page could not * be grabbed. */ -int __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags) +int __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, int refs, unsigned int flags) { struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ int __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags) return -EREMOTEIO;
if (flags & FOLL_GET) - folio_ref_inc(folio); + folio_ref_add(folio, refs); else if (flags & FOLL_PIN) { /* * Don't take a pin on the zero page - it's not going anywhere @@ -248,13 +248,13 @@ int __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags) * so that the page really is pinned. */ if (folio_test_large(folio)) { - folio_ref_add(folio, 1); - atomic_add(1, &folio->_pincount); + folio_ref_add(folio, refs); + atomic_add(refs, &folio->_pincount); } else { - folio_ref_add(folio, GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS); + folio_ref_add(folio, refs * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS); }
- node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED, 1); + node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED, refs); }
return 0; @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static unsigned long hugepte_addr_end(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, */ static int gup_hugepte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long sz, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, unsigned int flags, - struct page **pages, int *nr) + struct page **pages, int *nr, bool fast) { unsigned long pte_end; struct page *page; @@ -558,9 +558,14 @@ static int gup_hugepte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long sz page = pte_page(pte); refs = record_subpages(page, sz, addr, end, pages + *nr);
- folio = try_grab_folio(page, refs, flags); - if (!folio) - return 0; + if (fast) { + if (try_grab_page(page, refs, flags)) + return 0; + else { + folio = try_grab_folio(page, refs, flags); + if (!folio) + return 0; + }
if (unlikely(pte_val(pte) != pte_val(ptep_get(ptep)))) { gup_put_folio(folio, refs, flags); @@ -588,7 +593,7 @@ static int gup_hugepte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pte_t *ptep, unsigned long sz static int gup_hugepd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, hugepd_t hugepd, unsigned long addr, unsigned int pdshift, unsigned long end, unsigned int flags, - struct page **pages, int *nr) + struct page **pages, int *nr, bool fast) { pte_t *ptep; unsigned long sz = 1UL << hugepd_shift(hugepd); @@ -598,7 +603,7 @@ static int gup_hugepd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, hugepd_t hugepd, ptep = hugepte_offset(hugepd, addr, pdshift); do { next = hugepte_addr_end(addr, end, sz); - ret = gup_hugepte(vma, ptep, sz, addr, end, flags, pages, nr); + ret = gup_hugepte(vma, ptep, sz, addr, end, flags, pages, nr, fast); if (ret != 1) return ret; } while (ptep++, addr = next, addr != end); @@ -625,7 +630,7 @@ static struct page *follow_hugepd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, hugepd_t hugepd, ptep = hugepte_offset(hugepd, addr, pdshift); ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, vma->vm_mm, ptep); ret = gup_hugepd(vma, hugepd, addr, pdshift, addr + PAGE_SIZE, - flags, &page, &nr); + flags, &page, &nr, false); spin_unlock(ptl);
if (ret == 1) { @@ -642,7 +647,7 @@ static struct page *follow_hugepd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, hugepd_t hugepd, static inline int gup_hugepd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, hugepd_t hugepd, unsigned long addr, unsigned int pdshift, unsigned long end, unsigned int flags, - struct page **pages, int *nr) + struct page **pages, int *nr, bool fast) { return 0; } @@ -729,7 +734,7 @@ static struct page *follow_huge_pud(struct vm_area_struct *vma, gup_must_unshare(vma, flags, page)) return ERR_PTR(-EMLINK);
- ret = try_grab_page(page, flags); + ret = try_grab_page(page, 1, flags); if (ret) page = ERR_PTR(ret); else @@ -806,7 +811,7 @@ static struct page *follow_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, VM_BUG_ON_PAGE((flags & FOLL_PIN) && PageAnon(page) && !PageAnonExclusive(page), page);
- ret = try_grab_page(page, flags); + ret = try_grab_page(page, 1, flags); if (ret) return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -969,7 +974,7 @@ static struct page *follow_page_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, !PageAnonExclusive(page), page);
/* try_grab_page() does nothing unless FOLL_GET or FOLL_PIN is set. */ - ret = try_grab_page(page, flags); + ret = try_grab_page(page, 1, flags); if (unlikely(ret)) { page = ERR_PTR(ret); goto out; @@ -1233,7 +1238,7 @@ static int get_gate_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address, goto unmap; *page = pte_page(entry); } - ret = try_grab_page(*page, gup_flags); + ret = try_grab_page(*page, 1, gup_flags); if (unlikely(ret)) goto unmap; out: @@ -1636,22 +1641,20 @@ static long __get_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, * pages. */ if (page_increm > 1) { - struct folio *folio;
/* * Since we already hold refcount on the * large folio, this should never fail. */ - folio = try_grab_folio(page, page_increm - 1, + ret = try_grab_page(page, page_increm - 1, foll_flags); - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio)) { + if (unlikely(ret)) { /* * Release the 1st page ref if the * folio is problematic, fail hard. */ gup_put_folio(page_folio(page), 1, foll_flags); - ret = -EFAULT; goto out; } } @@ -3276,7 +3279,7 @@ static int gup_fast_pmd_range(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud, unsigned long addr, * pmd format and THP pmd format */ if (gup_hugepd(NULL, __hugepd(pmd_val(pmd)), addr, - PMD_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr) != 1) + PMD_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr, true) != 1) return 0; } else if (!gup_fast_pte_range(pmd, pmdp, addr, next, flags, pages, nr)) @@ -3306,7 +3309,7 @@ static int gup_fast_pud_range(p4d_t *p4dp, p4d_t p4d, unsigned long addr, return 0; } else if (unlikely(is_hugepd(__hugepd(pud_val(pud))))) { if (gup_hugepd(NULL, __hugepd(pud_val(pud)), addr, - PUD_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr) != 1) + PUD_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr, true) != 1) return 0; } else if (!gup_fast_pmd_range(pudp, pud, addr, next, flags, pages, nr)) @@ -3333,7 +3336,7 @@ static int gup_fast_p4d_range(pgd_t *pgdp, pgd_t pgd, unsigned long addr, BUILD_BUG_ON(p4d_leaf(p4d)); if (unlikely(is_hugepd(__hugepd(p4d_val(p4d))))) { if (gup_hugepd(NULL, __hugepd(p4d_val(p4d)), addr, - P4D_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr) != 1) + P4D_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr, true) != 1) return 0; } else if (!gup_fast_pud_range(p4dp, p4d, addr, next, flags, pages, nr)) @@ -3362,7 +3365,7 @@ static void gup_fast_pgd_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, return; } else if (unlikely(is_hugepd(__hugepd(pgd_val(pgd))))) { if (gup_hugepd(NULL, __hugepd(pgd_val(pgd)), addr, - PGDIR_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr) != 1) + PGDIR_SHIFT, next, flags, pages, nr, true) != 1) return; } else if (!gup_fast_p4d_range(pgdp, pgd, addr, next, flags, pages, nr)) diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 425374a..18604e4 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ struct page *follow_devmap_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, if (!*pgmap) return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT); page = pfn_to_page(pfn); - ret = try_grab_page(page, flags); + ret = try_grab_page(page, 1, flags); if (ret) page = ERR_PTR(ret);
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h index 2ea9a88..5305bbf 100644 --- a/mm/internal.h +++ b/mm/internal.h @@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ int migrate_device_coherent_page(struct page *page); * mm/gup.c */ struct folio *try_grab_folio(struct page *page, int refs, unsigned int flags); -int __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, unsigned int flags); +int __must_check try_grab_page(struct page *page, int refs, unsigned int flags);
/* * mm/huge_memory.c
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:01:58 +0800 yangge1116@126.com wrote:
From: yangge yangge1116@126.com
If a large number of CMA memory are configured in system (for example, the CMA memory accounts for 50% of the system memory), starting a SEV virtual machine will fail. During starting the SEV virtual machine, it will call pin_user_pages_fast(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin memory. Normally if a page is present and in CMA area, pin_user_pages_fast() will first call __get_user_pages_locked() to pin the page in CMA area, and then call check_and_migrate_movable_pages() to migrate the page from CMA area to non-CMA area. But the current code calling __get_user_pages_locked() will fail, because it call try_grab_folio() to pin page in gup slow path.
The commit 57edfcfd3419 ("mm/gup: accelerate thp gup even for "pages != NULL"") uses try_grab_folio() in gup slow path, which seems to be problematic because try_grap_folio() will check if the page can be longterm pinned. This check may fail and cause __get_user_pages_lock() to fail. However, these checks are not required in gup slow path, seems we can use try_grab_page() instead of try_grab_folio(). In addition, in the current code, try_grab_page() can only add 1 to the page's refcount. We extend this function so that the page's refcount can be increased according to the parameters passed in.
The following log reveals it:
[ 464.325306] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 6734 at mm/gup.c:1313 __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325464] CPU: 13 PID: 6734 Comm: qemu-kvm Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.6.33+ #6 [ 464.325477] RIP: 0010:__get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325515] Call Trace: [ 464.325520] <TASK> [ 464.325523] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325528] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 [ 464.325536] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325541] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 [ 464.325549] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ 464.325554] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 464.325558] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 464.325567] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325575] __gup_longterm_locked+0x212/0x7a0 [ 464.325583] internal_get_user_pages_fast+0xfb/0x190 [ 464.325590] pin_user_pages_fast+0x47/0x60 [ 464.325598] sev_pin_memory+0xca/0x170 [kvm_amd] [ 464.325616] sev_mem_enc_register_region+0x81/0x130 [kvm_amd]
Well, we also have Yang Shi's patch (https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240627231601.1713119-1-yang@os.amperecomputing.c...) which takes a significantly different approach. Which way should we go?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 1:42 PM Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:01:58 +0800 yangge1116@126.com wrote:
From: yangge yangge1116@126.com
If a large number of CMA memory are configured in system (for example, the CMA memory accounts for 50% of the system memory), starting a SEV virtual machine will fail. During starting the SEV virtual machine, it will call pin_user_pages_fast(..., FOLL_LONGTERM, ...) to pin memory. Normally if a page is present and in CMA area, pin_user_pages_fast() will first call __get_user_pages_locked() to pin the page in CMA area, and then call check_and_migrate_movable_pages() to migrate the page from CMA area to non-CMA area. But the current code calling __get_user_pages_locked() will fail, because it call try_grab_folio() to pin page in gup slow path.
The commit 57edfcfd3419 ("mm/gup: accelerate thp gup even for "pages != NULL"") uses try_grab_folio() in gup slow path, which seems to be problematic because try_grap_folio() will check if the page can be longterm pinned. This check may fail and cause __get_user_pages_lock() to fail. However, these checks are not required in gup slow path, seems we can use try_grab_page() instead of try_grab_folio(). In addition, in the current code, try_grab_page() can only add 1 to the page's refcount. We extend this function so that the page's refcount can be increased according to the parameters passed in.
The following log reveals it:
[ 464.325306] WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 6734 at mm/gup.c:1313 __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325464] CPU: 13 PID: 6734 Comm: qemu-kvm Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.6.33+ #6 [ 464.325477] RIP: 0010:__get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325515] Call Trace: [ 464.325520] <TASK> [ 464.325523] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325528] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 [ 464.325536] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325541] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 [ 464.325549] ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 [ 464.325554] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 464.325558] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 464.325567] ? __get_user_pages+0x423/0x520 [ 464.325575] __gup_longterm_locked+0x212/0x7a0 [ 464.325583] internal_get_user_pages_fast+0xfb/0x190 [ 464.325590] pin_user_pages_fast+0x47/0x60 [ 464.325598] sev_pin_memory+0xca/0x170 [kvm_amd] [ 464.325616] sev_mem_enc_register_region+0x81/0x130 [kvm_amd]
Well, we also have Yang Shi's patch (https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240627231601.1713119-1-yang@os.amperecomputing.c...) which takes a significantly different approach. Which way should we go?
IMO, my patch is more complete, it should be sent to the mainline. This patch can be considered if it is hard to backport my patch to the stable tree.
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Andrew Morton -
Yang Shi -
yangge1116＠126.com