Fix memory leak of control-message transfer buffer on successful open().
Fixes: 6774d5f53271 ("USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix open error path") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org ---
While reviewing Himadri's control-message series I noticed we have a related bug in klsi_105_open() that needs fixing.
drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c b/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c index 5ee48b0650c4..5f6b82ebccc5 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c @@ -276,12 +276,12 @@ static int klsi_105_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port) priv->cfg.unknown2 = cfg->unknown2; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
+ kfree(cfg); + /* READ_ON and urb submission */ rc = usb_serial_generic_open(tty, port); - if (rc) { - retval = rc; - goto err_free_cfg; - } + if (rc) + return rc;
rc = usb_control_msg(port->serial->dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(port->serial->dev, 0), @@ -324,8 +324,6 @@ static int klsi_105_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port) KLSI_TIMEOUT); err_generic_close: usb_serial_generic_close(port); -err_free_cfg: - kfree(cfg);
return retval; }
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:55:19AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
Fix memory leak of control-message transfer buffer on successful open().
Fixes: 6774d5f53271 ("USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix open error path") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org
While reviewing Himadri's control-message series I noticed we have a related bug in klsi_105_open() that needs fixing.
drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c b/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c index 5ee48b0650c4..5f6b82ebccc5 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c @@ -276,12 +276,12 @@ static int klsi_105_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port) priv->cfg.unknown2 = cfg->unknown2; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
- kfree(cfg);
- /* READ_ON and urb submission */ rc = usb_serial_generic_open(tty, port);
- if (rc) {
retval = rc;
goto err_free_cfg;
- }
- if (rc)
return rc;
rc = usb_control_msg(port->serial->dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(port->serial->dev, 0), @@ -324,8 +324,6 @@ static int klsi_105_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port) KLSI_TIMEOUT); err_generic_close: usb_serial_generic_close(port); -err_free_cfg:
- kfree(cfg);
return retval; }
I've applied this one now so that I can include it in my pull-request for -rc7.
Greg, just let me know if you think I should hold this one off for 5.11 instead.
Johan
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:06:38PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:55:19AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
Fix memory leak of control-message transfer buffer on successful open().
Fixes: 6774d5f53271 ("USB: serial: kl5kusb105: fix open error path") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold johan@kernel.org
While reviewing Himadri's control-message series I noticed we have a related bug in klsi_105_open() that needs fixing.
drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c b/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c index 5ee48b0650c4..5f6b82ebccc5 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/kl5kusb105.c @@ -276,12 +276,12 @@ static int klsi_105_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port) priv->cfg.unknown2 = cfg->unknown2; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
- kfree(cfg);
- /* READ_ON and urb submission */ rc = usb_serial_generic_open(tty, port);
- if (rc) {
retval = rc;
goto err_free_cfg;
- }
- if (rc)
return rc;
rc = usb_control_msg(port->serial->dev, usb_sndctrlpipe(port->serial->dev, 0), @@ -324,8 +324,6 @@ static int klsi_105_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port) KLSI_TIMEOUT); err_generic_close: usb_serial_generic_close(port); -err_free_cfg:
- kfree(cfg);
return retval; }
I've applied this one now so that I can include it in my pull-request for -rc7.
Greg, just let me know if you think I should hold this one off for 5.11 instead.
Nope, it's fine to take this now, thanks.
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org