On 4/24/25 20:08, Christian Ludloff wrote:

...

[ICX143 in https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/637780] There is no equivalent erratum for the "Xeon D" Ice Lakes so INTEL_ICELAKE_D is not affected.

There is ICXD80 in...

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/714069/intel-xeon-d-... https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/content-details/714071/intel-xeon-d-...

And although the ICL spec update...

https://edc.intel.com/content/www/us/en/design/ipla/software-development-pla...

...doesn't seem to have a MONITOR erratum, it might be a good idea for Intel to double check.

Hey Christian!

Thanks for noticing this, btw. It took a little while to track down exactly what was going on here. Turns out the original patch here is correct, but for the wrong reasons.

ICX-D is not affected. It seems that there was a little copy-and-paste error when putting together the ICX-D errata list. MONITOR should be fine on ICX-D.

A new version of the ICX-D errata list will need to get pushed out at some point.