On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:08:44PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:

Commit b7c0ccdfbafd ("mm: zswap: support large folios in zswap_store()") skips charging any zswap entries when it failed to zswap the entire folio.

However, when some base pages are zswapped but it failed to zswap the entire folio, the zswap operation is rolled back. When freeing zswap entries for those pages, zswap_entry_free() uncharges the zswap entries that were not previously charged, causing zswap charging to become inconsistent.

This inconsistency triggers two warnings with following steps: # On a machine with 64GiB of RAM and 36GiB of zswap $ stress-ng --bigheap 2 # wait until the OOM-killer kills stress-ng $ sudo reboot

The two warnings are: in mm/memcontrol.c:163, function obj_cgroup_release(): WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_bytes & (PAGE_SIZE - 1));

in mm/page_counter.c:60, function page_counter_cancel():
  if (WARN_ONCE(new < 0, "page_counter underflow: %ld nr_pages=%lu\n",
 new, nr_pages))

zswap_stored_pages also becomes inconsistent in the same way.

As suggested by Kanchana, increment zswap_stored_pages and charge zswap entries within zswap_store_page() when it succeeds. This way, zswap_entry_free() will decrement the counter and uncharge the entries when it failed to zswap the entire folio.

While this could potentially be optimized by batching objcg charging and incrementing the counter, let's focus on fixing the bug this time and leave the optimization for later after some evaluation.

After resolving the inconsistency, the warnings disappear.

Fixes: b7c0ccdfbafd ("mm: zswap: support large folios in zswap_store()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Co-developed-by: Kanchana P Sridhar kanchana.p.sridhar@intel.com Signed-off-by: Kanchana P Sridhar kanchana.p.sridhar@intel.com Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com

I have a few nits, but generally:

Acked-by: Yosry Ahmed yosry.ahmed@linux.dev

---

v2 -> v3:

• Adjusted Kanchana's feedback:
  • Fixed inconsistency in zswap_stored_pages
  • Now objcg charging and incrementing zswap_store_pages is done within zswap_stored_pages, one by one

mm/zswap.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c index 6504174fbc6a..f0bd962bffd5 100644 --- a/mm/zswap.c +++ b/mm/zswap.c @@ -1504,11 +1504,14 @@ static ssize_t zswap_store_page(struct page *page, entry->pool = pool; entry->swpentry = page_swpentry; entry->objcg = objcg;

• if (objcg)

• obj_cgroup_charge_zswap(objcg, entry->length);
  

nit: This can be moved to the existing if (objcg) check where we call obj_cgroup_get(). At that point there shouldn't be a possibility of failure. If you want to keep it here to make it obvious that we only charge when we set entry->objcg that's fine, but we can probably move obj_cgroup_get() here as well in this case.

entry->referenced = true; if (entry->length) { INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru); zswap_lru_add(&zswap_list_lru, entry); }

• atomic_long_inc(&zswap_stored_pages);

nit: If you keep the charging after setting entry->objcg because that's when the freeing path will uncharge, then perhaps you want to move this after the tree store is successful, because at that point the freeing path will decrement the counter.

return entry->length; @@ -1526,7 +1529,6 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio) struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL; struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; struct zswap_pool *pool;

• size_t compressed_bytes = 0; bool ret = false; long index;

@@ -1569,15 +1571,11 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio) bytes = zswap_store_page(page, objcg, pool); if (bytes < 0) goto put_pool;

Do we need 'bytes' anymore? I think we don't even need zswap_store_page() to return the compressed size anymore. Seems like a boolean will suffice.

• compressed_bytes += bytes;
  

  }

• if (objcg) {

• obj_cgroup_charge_zswap(objcg, compressed_bytes);
  

• if (objcg) count_objcg_events(objcg, ZSWPOUT, nr_pages);

• }

• atomic_long_add(nr_pages, &zswap_stored_pages); count_vm_events(ZSWPOUT, nr_pages);

ret = true; -- 2.47.1