The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From bd3599a0e142cd73edd3b6801068ac3f48ac771a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 01:36:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix file data corruption after cloning a range and fsync
When we clone a range into a file we can end up dropping existing extent maps (or trimming them) and replacing them with new ones if the range to be cloned overlaps with a range in the destination inode. When that happens we add the new extent maps to the list of modified extents in the inode's extent map tree, so that a "fast" fsync (the flag BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC not set in the inode) will see the extent maps and log corresponding extent items. However, at the end of range cloning operation we do truncate all the pages in the affected range (in order to ensure future reads will not get stale data). Sometimes this truncation will release the corresponding extent maps besides the pages from the page cache. If this happens, then a "fast" fsync operation will miss logging some extent items, because it relies exclusively on the extent maps being present in the inode's extent tree, leading to data loss/corruption if the fsync ends up using the same transaction used by the clone operation (that transaction was not committed in the meanwhile). An extent map is released through the callback btrfs_invalidatepage(), which gets called by truncate_inode_pages_range(), and it calls __btrfs_releasepage(). The later ends up calling try_release_extent_mapping() which will release the extent map if some conditions are met, like the file size being greater than 16Mb, gfp flags allow blocking and the range not being locked (which is the case during the clone operation) nor being the extent map flagged as pinned (also the case for cloning).
The following example, turned into a test for fstests, reproduces the issue:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x18 9000K 6908K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x20 2572K 156K" /mnt/bar
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar # reflink destination offset corresponds to the size of file bar, # 2728Kb minus 4Kb. $ xfs_io -c ""reflink ${SCRATCH_MNT}/foo 0 2724K 15908K" /mnt/bar $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar
$ md5sum /mnt/bar 95a95813a8c2abc9aa75a6c2914a077e /mnt/bar
<power fail>
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ md5sum /mnt/bar 207fd8d0b161be8a84b945f0df8d5f8d /mnt/bar # digest should be 95a95813a8c2abc9aa75a6c2914a077e like before the # power failure
In the above example, the destination offset of the clone operation corresponds to the size of the "bar" file minus 4Kb. So during the clone operation, the extent map covering the range from 2572Kb to 2728Kb gets trimmed so that it ends at offset 2724Kb, and a new extent map covering the range from 2724Kb to 11724Kb is created. So at the end of the clone operation when we ask to truncate the pages in the range from 2724Kb to 2724Kb + 15908Kb, the page invalidation callback ends up removing the new extent map (through try_release_extent_mapping()) when the page at offset 2724Kb is passed to that callback.
Fix this by setting the bit BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC whenever an extent map is removed at try_release_extent_mapping(), forcing the next fsync to search for modified extents in the fs/subvolume tree instead of relying on the presence of extent maps in memory. This way we can continue doing a "fast" fsync if the destination range of a clone operation does not overlap with an existing range or if any of the criteria necessary to remove an extent map at try_release_extent_mapping() is not met (file size not bigger then 16Mb or gfp flags do not allow blocking).
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.16+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 1aa91d57404a..8fd86e29085f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -4241,8 +4241,9 @@ int try_release_extent_mapping(struct page *page, gfp_t mask) struct extent_map *em; u64 start = page_offset(page); u64 end = start + PAGE_SIZE - 1; - struct extent_io_tree *tree = &BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->io_tree; - struct extent_map_tree *map = &BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->extent_tree; + struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode = BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host); + struct extent_io_tree *tree = &btrfs_inode->io_tree; + struct extent_map_tree *map = &btrfs_inode->extent_tree;
if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(mask) && page->mapping->host->i_size > SZ_16M) { @@ -4265,6 +4266,8 @@ int try_release_extent_mapping(struct page *page, gfp_t mask) extent_map_end(em) - 1, EXTENT_LOCKED | EXTENT_WRITEBACK, 0, NULL)) { + set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC, + &btrfs_inode->runtime_flags); remove_extent_mapping(map, em); /* once for the rb tree */ free_extent_map(em);
Hi Greg,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 06:31:43PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
The attached backported patch should apply to v4.14-stable.
-- Regards Sudip
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 10:18:32PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 06:31:43PM +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
The attached backported patch should apply to v4.14-stable.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
linux-stable-mirror@lists.linaro.org